Literature DB >> 22836074

Lipoprotein(a) particle concentration and lipoprotein(a) cholesterol assays yield discordant classification of patients into four physiologically discrete groups.

Matthew Konerman1, Krishnaji Kulkarni, Peter P Toth, Steven R Jones.   

Abstract

There is little known about the relative predictive value of different lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] assays in clinical use, although each has been shown to predict similar incremental risk over conventional clinical and lipid risk factors. Thus, we examined the classification behavior of two commonly used Lp(a) assays and their associations with other lipid parameters. Serum lipid and Lp(a) concentrations were measured in 144 primary and secondary prevention patients. Lp(a) cholesterol [Lp(a)-C] was measured with the Vertical Auto Profile (upper limit of normal, 10 mg/dL). Lp(a) particle concentrations [Lp(a)-P] were measured with an isoform-independent molar assay (upper limit of normal, 70 nmol/L). The subjects were divided into the following four groups on the basis of their Lp(a)-C and Lp(a)-P levels: normal Lp(a)-P and Lp(a)-C; high Lp(a)-P and normal Lp(a)-C; normal Lp(a)-P and high Lp(a)-C; and high Lp(a)-P and Lp(a)-C. The proportion of subjects with values above the upper limit of normal was similar with both assays (P = .15). However, the Lp(a)-C and Lp(a)-P assays discordantly classified 23% of the study's subjects. In addition, the four Lp(a)-defined groups displayed differences in their relationships with other lipoproteins. The two groups with elevated Lp(a)-C showed significant associations with higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein AI, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol/apolipoprotein AI ratios. Triglycerides were also noted to be above normal in discordant and normal within concordant Lp(a) groups. Finally, the amount of cholesterol per Lp(a) particle [Lp(a)-C/Lp(a)-P] varied widely across the four groups. These findings suggest that the four Lp(a)-defined groups are physiologically discrete. Further investigation is warranted to assess which parameters among Lp(a)-P, Lp(a)-C, and Lp(a)-C/Lp(a)-P can be used to more accurately characterize Lp(a)-associated cardiovascular risk.
Copyright © 2012 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22836074     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2012.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lipidol        ISSN: 1876-4789            Impact factor:   4.766


  4 in total

1.  HDL-C, ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux, and lipoprotein(a): insights into a potential novel physiologic role of lipoprotein(a).

Authors:  Calvin Yeang; Sotirios Tsimikas
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.922

Review 2.  Lipoprotein(a): An independent, genetic, and causal factor for cardiovascular disease and acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Enas A Enas; Basil Varkey; T S Dharmarajan; Guillaume Pare; Vinay K Bahl
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2019-03-20

3.  Low LPA gene kringle IV-2 repeat copy number association with elevated lipoprotein (a) concentration as an independent risk factor of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease in the Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Lishan Sun; Ming Zong; Cuncun Chen; Lihong Xie; Fei Wu; Ming Yu; Lieying Fan
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 4.  Elevated Lipoprotein(a): Background, Current Insights and Future Potential Therapies.

Authors:  Ahmed Handhle; Adie Viljoen; Anthony S Wierzbicki
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2021-09-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.