Literature DB >> 22835780

Efficacy of irinotecan single drug treatment in children with refractory or recurrent hepatoblastoma--a phase II trial of the childhood liver tumour strategy group (SIOPEL).

József Zsíros1, Laurence Brugières, Penelope Brock, Derek Roebuck, Rudolf Maibach, Margaret Child, Bruce Morland, Michela Casanova, Daniele Pariente, Claudia Paris, Beatriz de Camargo, Milind Ronghe, Arthur Zimmermann, Jack Plaschkes, Piotr Czauderna, Giorgio Perilongo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical activity of irinotecan as single drug in children with refractory or recurrent hepatoblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four cycles of irinotecan were administered (20mg/m(2)/day intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1-5 and 8-12, every 21days) unless tumour progression occurred or resectability was achieved earlier. Tumour response was assessed according to modified SIOPEL and Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria. Main end-points were best overall response rate (RR), early progression rate (EPR) and progression free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: Twenty-four eligible patients (median age 58.0months; 19 boys) were enrolled in the study (11 relapses, 13 refractory diseases). Of the 23 evaluable patients six had an overall partial response, 11 stable disease and six progressive disease, of which four were early progression (RR: 26%, EPR: 17%). In eight patients the residual tumour could be completely resected; seven patients became tumour free. At last follow-up 12 patients were alive (six with no evidence of disease, six with disease). PFS at 1year was 24%. Patients with relapse had a higher RR than patients with refractory disease (46% versus 8%) and patients with isolated lung lesions showed a better response than patients with other tumour localisations (50% versus 13%). The main grade 3-4 toxicities, diarrhoea and neutropenia, occurred in half of the patients.
CONCLUSION: Irinotecan has a significant anti-tumour activity and acceptable toxicity in patients with relapsed hepatoblastoma and therefore should be considered for the treatment of these patients. Exploration of the role of irinotecan in the initial treatment of hepatoblastoma is warranted.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22835780     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  8 in total

1.  Upfront window vincristine/irinotecan treatment of high-risk hepatoblastoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group AHEP0731 study committee.

Authors:  Howard M Katzenstein; Wayne L Furman; Marcio H Malogolowkin; Mark D Krailo; M Beth McCarville; Alexander J Towbin; Greg M Tiao; Milton J Finegold; Sarangarajan Ranganathan; Stephen P Dunn; Max R Langham; Eugene D McGahren; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Rebecka L Meyers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Management of Hepatoblastoma: ICMR Consensus Document.

Authors:  Sandeep Agarwala; Alisha Gupta; Deepak Bansal; Tushar Vora; Maya Prasad; Brijesh Arora; Gauri Kapoor; Girish Chinnaswamy; Venkatraman Radhakrishnan; Siddharth Laskar; Tanvir Kaur; Rupinder Singh Dhaliwal; G K Rath; Sameer Bakhshi
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 3.  The treatment of hepatoblastoma: Its evolution and the current status as per the SIOPEL trials.

Authors:  Daniel C Aronson; Piotr Czauderna; Rudolf Maibach; Giorgio Perilongo; Bruce Morland
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-10

4.  Volasertib preclinical activity in high-risk hepatoblastoma.

Authors:  Stefano Cairo; Charles Keller; Dina Kats; Cora A Ricker; Noah E Berlow; Bénédicte Noblet; Delphine Nicolle; Katell Mevel; Sophie Branchereau; Jean-Gabriel Judde; Cody D Stiverson; Christina L Stiverson; Matthew N Svalina; Teagan Settelmeyer; Kevin Matlock; Melvin Lathara; Charlotte Mussini; James I Geller; Christopher Noakes; Ido Sloma; Narendra Bharathy
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2019-11-05

5.  CHIC Risk Stratification System for Predicting the Survival of Children With Hepatoblastoma: Data From Children With Hepatoblastoma in China.

Authors:  Junting Huang; Yang Hu; Hong Jiang; Yanjie Xu; Suying Lu; Feifei Sun; Jia Zhu; Juan Wang; Xiaofei Sun; Juncheng Liu; Zijun Zhen; Yizhuo Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Clinical Profile of Hepatoblastoma: Experience From a Tertiary Care Centre in a Resource-Limited Setting.

Authors:  Arkadeep Dhali; Tuhin S Mandal; Somak Das; Gautam Ray; Prasenjit Halder; Debarshi Bose; Suparna K Pal; Sukanta Ray; Abhijit Chowdhury; Gopal Krishna Dhali
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-01

7.  A case of hepatoblastoma misdiagnosed as combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma in an adult.

Authors:  Keun Woo Park; Chang Jin Seo; Dae Young Yun; Min Keun Kim; Byung Seok Kim; Young Seok Han; Hoon Kyu Oh; Chang Hyeong Lee
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2015-09-30

8.  Immunotoxin targeting glypican-3 regresses liver cancer via dual inhibition of Wnt signalling and protein synthesis.

Authors:  Wei Gao; Zhewei Tang; Yi-Fan Zhang; Mingqian Feng; Min Qian; Dimiter S Dimitrov; Mitchell Ho
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 17.694

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.