| Literature DB >> 22835267 |
Paola Brancaccio1, Francesco Mario Limongelli, Iride Paolillo, Antonio D'Aponte, Vincenzo Donnarumma, Luca Rastrelli.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest that mineral waters with high concentrations of calcium and bicarbonate can impact acid-base balance. The purpose of this study was to test the effect on acid-base balance and specific urine gravity, of a bicarbonate calcic mineral water (Acqua Lete®) compared to a minimally mineralized water.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22835267 PMCID: PMC3423013 DOI: 10.1186/1550-2783-9-35
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr ISSN: 1550-2783 Impact factor: 5.150
Chemical characteristics of mineral waters used in the study*
| Conductivity | mS/cm | 1321.40 ± 46.10 | 17.57 ± 0.91 |
| pH | pH | 6.14 ± 0.11 | 5.00 ± 0.09 |
| Fixed residue | mg/l | 878.41 ± 25.21 | 14.31 ± 0.68 |
| CO2 | mg/L | 1890.12 ± 72.51 | 15.22 ± 0.77 |
| HCO3- | mg/l | 981.11 ± 33.82 | 3.51 ± 0.15 |
| Cl- | mg/l | 8.24 ± 2.22 | 0.41 ± 0.02 |
| SO42- | mg/l | 6.60 ± 0.91 | 1.40 ± 0.08 |
| NO3- | mg/l | 4.14 ± 0.20 | 1.91 ± 0.08 |
| Na+ | mg/l | 4.91 ± 0.33 | 1.21 ± 0.05 |
| K+ | mg/l | 2.10 ± 0.08 | 0.32 ± 0.01 |
| Ca++ | mg/l | 313.70 ± 9.81 | 1.11 ± 0.05 |
| Mg++ | mg/l | 15.12 ± 3.92 | 0.42 ± 0.03 |
| Fe | mg/l | 0.02 ± 0.01 | < 0.01 |
| Sr++ | mg/l | 0.15 ± 0.01 | < 0.1 |
| Li+ | mg/l | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
*Each results represents the mean ± SD of three analysis for each water.
Total body water (TBW), Extracellular water (ECW) and Intracellular water (ICW) in Test C (control) and in Test H (hydration) before and after exercise*
| Group A | 56.69 ± 1.14a | 55.30 ± 1.05a | 40.60 ± 2.48 | 41.20 ± 2.84 | 59.40 ± 2.40 | 58.81 ± 2.84 |
| Group B | 57.50 ± 1.80b | 55.87 ± 0.75b | 37.76 ± 4.17 | 37.46 ± 2.82 | 62.24 ± 4.17 | 62.54 ± 2.82 |
| | ||||||
| Group A | 57.83 ± 3.75 | 57.43 ± 5.01 | 40.85 ± 2.87 | 40.57 ± 2.42 | 59.15 ± 2.87 | 59.43 ± 2.42 |
| Group B | 57.84 ± 2.26 | 57.37 ± 3.11 | 38.47 ± 1.11c | 37.10 ± 1.04c | 61.53 ± 1.14d | 62.94 ± 0.94d |
*values are expressed in percentage (%).
Data are expressed as mean ± SD: n = 44.
Mean values were significantly different from resting values (t0): a and bp < 0.001; c and dp < 0.05.
Urine pH detected in Test C (control) and in Test H (hydration) before and after Exercise*
| Group A | 5.6 ± 0.2a | 5.3 ± 0.1a |
| Group B | 5.6 ± 0.4 | 5.4 ± 0.5 |
| Group A | 5.5 ± 0.8 | 5.4 ± 0.9 |
| Group B | 5.4 ± 0.2b | 5.7 ± 0.1b |
* Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 44.
Mean values were significantly different: a and bp < 0.05.
Figure 1Urinary specific gravity detected in Test C (Control) before and after exercise*. *Data are expressed as mean ± SD; n = 44; Group A: 1020 ± 4.7 (t0) vs 1022 ± 4.4 (t3): p = < 0.05 Group B: 1018 ± 6.5 (t0) vs 1019 ± 5.5(t3), p = ns.
Figure 2Urinary specific gravity detected in Test H (test with hydration) before (t) and 30’ after exercise (t)*. *Data are expressed as mean ± SD; n = 44; Group A: 1021 ± 4.6 (t0) vs 1014 ± 4.1(t3), p = < 0.05 Group B: 1021 ± 3.7 (t0) vs 1008 ± 4.3 (t3), p = < 0.05 Group A (t3) vs Group B (t3) = p < 0.05.