Literature DB >> 22834993

Estimating propensity scores and causal survival functions using prevalent survival data.

Yu-Jen Cheng1, Mei-Cheng Wang.   

Abstract

This article develops semiparametric approaches for estimation of propensity scores and causal survival functions from prevalent survival data. The analytical problem arises when the prevalent sampling is adopted for collecting failure times and, as a result, the covariates are incompletely observed due to their association with failure time. The proposed procedure for estimating propensity scores shares interesting features similar to the likelihood formulation in case-control study, but in our case it requires additional consideration in the intercept term. The result shows that the corrected propensity scores in logistic regression setting can be obtained through standard estimation procedure with specific adjustments on the intercept term. For causal estimation, two different types of missing sources are encountered in our model: one can be explained by potential outcome framework; the other is caused by the prevalent sampling scheme. Statistical analysis without adjusting bias from both sources of missingness will lead to biased results in causal inference. The proposed methods were partly motivated by and applied to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked data for women diagnosed with breast cancer.
© 2012, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22834993      PMCID: PMC3508756          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01754.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  13 in total

Review 1.  Invited commentary: propensity scores.

Authors:  M M Joffe; P R Rosenbaum
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Utilizing propensity scores to estimate causal treatment effects with censored time-lagged data.

Authors:  K J Anstrom; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Why match? Investigating matched case-control study designs with causal effect estimation.

Authors:  Sherri Rose; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  On the estimation and use of propensity scores in case-control and case-cohort studies.

Authors:  Roger Månsson; Marshall M Joffe; Wenguang Sun; Sean Hennessy
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores.

Authors:  D B Rubin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Analyzing Length-biased Data with Semiparametric Transformation and Accelerated Failure Time Models.

Authors:  Yu Shen; Jing Ning; Jing Qin
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Biases in prevalent cohorts.

Authors:  R Brookmeyer; M H Gail
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Statistical methods for analyzing right-censored length-biased data under cox model.

Authors:  Jing Qin; Yu Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Staging and follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  D W Kinne
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of right- and left-approach esophagectomy for elderly patients with operable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity matched study.

Authors:  Qianwen Liu; Junying Chen; Jing Wen; Hong Yang; Yi Hu; Kongjia Luo; Zihui Tan; Jianhua Fu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Survival analysis without survival data: connecting length-biased and case-control data.

Authors:  Kwun Chuen Gary Chan
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.445

3.  Causal estimation using semiparametric transformation models under prevalent sampling.

Authors:  Yu-Jen Cheng; Mei-Cheng Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Length-biased semi-competing risks models for cross-sectional data: an application to current duration of pregnancy attempt data.

Authors:  Alexander C McLain; Siyuan Guo; Jiajia Zhang; Thoma Marie
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 1.959

5.  Propensity Score Estimation in the Presence of Length-biased Sampling: A Nonparametric Adjustment Approach.

Authors:  Ashkan Ertefaie; Masoud Asgharian; David Stephens
Journal:  Stat       Date:  2014-01-01

6.  Estimating treatment effects in observational studies with both prevalent and incident cohorts.

Authors:  Jing Ning; Chuan Hong; Liang Li; Xuelin Huang; Yu Shen
Journal:  Can J Stat       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 0.875

7.  CT Scan Findings Can Predict the Safety of Delayed Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis.

Authors:  Byeong Geon Jeon; Hyuk Jung Kim; Seung Chul Heo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Modified inflammation-based score as an independent malignant predictor in patients with pulmonary focal ground-glass opacity: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Long Jiang; Shanshan Jiang; Yongbin Lin; Han Yang; Zerui Zhao; Zehua Xie; Yaobin Lin; Hao Long
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Minimal-Invasive Versus Open Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Bicentric Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes and Long-Term Survival Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Sebastian Knitter; Andreas Andreou; Daniel Kradolfer; Anika Sophie Beierle; Sina Pesthy; Anne-Christine Eichelberg; Anika Kästner; Linda Feldbrügge; Felix Krenzien; Mareike Schulz; Vanessa Banz; Anja Lachenmayer; Matthias Biebl; Wenzel Schöning; Daniel Candinas; Johann Pratschke; Guido Beldi; Moritz Schmelzle
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.