Literature DB >> 22834900

High physician adherence to phenotype-specific asthma guidelines, but large variability in phenotype assessment in children.

Francine M Ducharme1, Jonathan Morin, G Michael Davis, Joanie Gingras, Francisco J D Noya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The implementation of international pediatric asthma guidelines hinges on the distinction between intermittent and persistent phenotypes and the prescription of recommended phenotype-specific pharmacotherapy.
OBJECTIVES: To ascertain key factors associated with specialist-confirmed phenotype and document physicians' adherence to practice recommendations in an academic pediatric asthma center. DESIGN/
METHODS: Using electronic health records, we identified a cohort of children aged 1-17 years who presented to a tertiary-care asthma center between 2002 and 2007 and received a diagnosis of asthma from a pediatric specialist. Outcomes included: determinants of phenotypes and conformity with phenotype-specific treatment recommendations.
RESULTS: Of the 3490 eligible children (11,119 visits), most (47%) were preschoolers, 35% were 6-11 years and 18%, 13-17 years. Of children with confirmed asthma, 59% were classified on presentation as having intermittent, 41% as persistent, asthma. The within-patient phenotype varied over time with a consistency index of 0.76 (best=1); the latter was significantly lower in preschoolers than older children (p<0.0001). The persistent phenotype was highly physician-dependent; it was also positively associated with child's age, asthma severity, multiple triggers, calendar year, and duration of follow-up. Compared to 33% of children with intermittent asthma, 82% of those with persistent asthma were prescribed a maintenance controller, most as monotherapy; combination therapy was usually prescribed after a trial of monotherapy.
CONCLUSION: Pediatric asthma specialists were highly adherent to phenotype-specific pharmacotherapy. However, even in an academic center, the notable degree of intra-patient and between-physician variation in phenotype, particularly in preschoolers, was an important impediment to prescribing a maintenance controller. The findings underline the importance of developing validated and standardized means of assessing phenotypes, applicable to the whole pediatric age spectrum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22834900     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2012.716031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  4 in total

1.  Do Patients of Subspecialist Physicians Benefit from Written Asthma Action Plans?

Authors:  Beverley J Sheares; Robert B Mellins; Emily Dimango; Denise Serebrisky; Yuan Zhang; Michael R Bye; Mark E Dovey; Sami Nachman; Vincent Hutchinson; David Evans
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Leukotriene receptor antagonists as maintenance and intermittent therapy for episodic viral wheeze in children.

Authors:  Malcolm Brodlie; Atul Gupta; Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez; Jose A Castro-Rodriguez; Francine M Ducharme; Michael C McKean
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-19

3.  Initial step-up treatment changes in asthmatic children already prescribed inhaled corticosteroids: a historical cohort study.

Authors:  Steve W Turner; Kathryn Richardson; Annie Burden; Mike Thomas; Clare Murray; David Price
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.871

4.  Vitamin D intervention in preschoolers with viral-induced asthma (DIVA): a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Megan E Jensen; Genevieve Mailhot; Nathalie Alos; Elizabeth Rousseau; John H White; Ali Khamessan; Francine M Ducharme
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.