Literature DB >> 22834881

A cross-sectional analysis of the effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient controlled analgesia on postcesarean pain and breastfeeding.

Anne B Woods1, Barbara Crist, Shirley Kowalewski, Joyce Carroll, Joan Warren, Joan Robertson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) versus patient controlled analgesia (PCA) for postcesarean analgesia and to determine the impact of analgesic modality on breastfeeding in the first 24 hours postpartum.
DESIGN: A retrospective, descriptive, comparative, correlational design.
SETTING: A metropolitan, community, teaching hospital in the northeast United States. PARTICIPANTS: Medical records for all women with cesarean births in 2007 of at least 34 weeks gestational age (N = 621).
METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval, electronic medical records and clinical charts were reviewed by the study team. Data were analyzed with PASW version 18.0.
RESULTS: Women with PCEA reported significantly less average pain (p = .000) and required significantly less analgesic adjuvant medication doses (p = .038) than women with PCA. Statistically significant negative correlations were found for average total pain score with number of breastfeeding sessions (p = .023). Controlling for confounders, women with PCEA had 2.2 times the odds of mild pain compared to PCA (p = .03). Women with mild pain (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.4, p = .03), term neonate (aOR = 3.2, p = .006), breastfeeding within 2 hours (aOR = 3.2, p = .000), and no supplemental feedings (aOR = 6.9, p = .002) had significantly greater odds of breastfeeding 6+ times in the first 24 hours.
CONCLUSION: Patient-controlled epidural anesthesia confers greater pain control postcesarean than PCA. Women with greater pain are less likely to breastfeed six or more times within the first 24 hours. This could potentially affect duration of breastfeeding. Intraprofessional measures to improve pain management are warranted.
© 2012 AWHONN, the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22834881     DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01370.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0090-0311


  5 in total

1.  Effect of pumping pressure on onset of lactation after caesarean section: A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Yahui Yang; Ting Bai; Lele Sun; Mingzhu Sun; Xueling Shi; Meng Zhu; Meijuan Ge; Haiou Xia
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Efficacy and safety of post-cesarean section incisional infiltration with lidocaine and epinephrine versus lidocaine alone in reducing postoperative pain: A randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial.

Authors:  Ahmed A Tharwat; Amr H Yehia; Karim A Wahba; Abd-Elrhman G Ali
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-01-12

3.  Clinical Analysis of Breast Lactation after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Nonlactation Period.

Authors:  Dao-Ming Liang; Yi Zhang; Hua Wang; Tao Huang; Xin Xue
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ravindu P Gunatilake; Geeta K Swamy; Leo R Brancazio; Michael P Smrtka; Jennifer L Thompson; Jennifer B Gilner; Beverly A Gray; Robert Phillips Heine
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2017-07-14

5.  Elastic Abdominal Binders Reduce Cesarean Pain Postoperatively: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Jamie L Gustafson; Fanglong Dong; Jennifer Duong; Zachary C Kuhlmann
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2018-05-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.