PURPOSE: To report the feasibility and the safety of a surgeon-controlled robotic endoscope holder in laparoscopic surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 2010 to September 2010, 20 patients were enrolled prospectively to undergo alaparoscopic procedure using an innovative robotic endoscope holder. Two surgeons performed six adrenalectomies, four sacrocolpopexies, five pyeloplasties, four radical prostatectomies, and one radical nephrectomy. Demographic data, overall setup time, operative time, number of assistants needed were reviewed. Surgeon satisfaction regarding the ergonomics was assessed using a 10-point scale. Postoperative clinical outcomes were reviewed at day 1 and 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: The per-protocol analysis was performed on 17 patients for whom the robot was effectively used for surgery. Median age was 63 years; 10 (59%) patients were female. Median body mass index was 26.8. Surgical procedures were completed with the robot in 12 (71%) cases. Median number of surgical assistant was 0. Overall setup time with the robot was 19 minutes; operative time was 130 minutes during which the robot was used 71% of the time. Mean hospital stay was 6.94 ± 2.3 days. Median score regarding the easiness of use was 7. Median pain level was 1.5/10 at day 1 and 0 at 1 month postoperatively. Open conversion was needed in one (6%) case, and four minor complications occurred in two (12%) patients. CONCLUSION: This use of this novel robotic laparoscope holder is safe, feasible, and provides good comfort to the surgeon.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To report the feasibility and the safety of a surgeon-controlled robotic endoscope holder in laparoscopic surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 2010 to September 2010, 20 patients were enrolled prospectively to undergo a laparoscopic procedure using an innovative robotic endoscope holder. Two surgeons performed six adrenalectomies, four sacrocolpopexies, five pyeloplasties, four radical prostatectomies, and one radical nephrectomy. Demographic data, overall setup time, operative time, number of assistants needed were reviewed. Surgeon satisfaction regarding the ergonomics was assessed using a 10-point scale. Postoperative clinical outcomes were reviewed at day 1 and 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: The per-protocol analysis was performed on 17 patients for whom the robot was effectively used for surgery. Median age was 63 years; 10 (59%) patients were female. Median body mass index was 26.8. Surgical procedures were completed with the robot in 12 (71%) cases. Median number of surgical assistant was 0. Overall setup time with the robot was 19 minutes; operative time was 130 minutes during which the robot was used 71% of the time. Mean hospital stay was 6.94 ± 2.3 days. Median score regarding the easiness of use was 7. Median pain level was 1.5/10 at day 1 and 0 at 1 month postoperatively. Open conversion was needed in one (6%) case, and four minor complications occurred in two (12%) patients. CONCLUSION: This use of this novel robotic laparoscope holder is safe, feasible, and provides good comfort to the surgeon.