Literature DB >> 22834703

Patient perceptions of epinephrine auto-injectors: exploring barriers to use.

Arthur G Money1, Julie Barnett, Jasna Kuljis, Jane Lucas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, government initiatives have proposed that patient self-care should serve as a key resource in response to the anticipated increase in global demand for health care. However, if patients are to be empowered as self-carers, barriers to engagement must be identified and overcome. Anaphylaxis is an increasingly common life-threatening allergic reaction. Patients at risk of anaphylaxis are prescribed epinephrine auto-injectors and play a crucial role in delivering their own care and management of this condition. One key recommendation is that patients routinely carry an epinephrine auto-injector with them and deploy the device when needed. However, only a small proportion of patients that require epinephrine actually receive it.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the reasons why patients who have been prescribed epinephrine auto-injectors fail to adhere to self-care and management recommendations.
METHODS: In-depth interviews with 15 adults who have been prescribed epinephrine auto-injectors were carried out to explore the barriers that exist in the provision of effective self-care and management of anaphylaxis.
RESULTS: Inconsistent health professional advice, perceived stigma of carrying a 'weapon-like' device, poor device design and limited patient training were identified as barriers to carriage or use. Patients were reluctant to carry devices in public because of perceived and observed stigma and suspicion. They were happy to ignore expiry dates, and some participants were confident that the emergency services would provide them with the appropriate care they needed, and therefore, did not carry the device in urban areas. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Improved training of patients, the public and health professionals around both the carriage and use of auto-injectors are areas for urgent attention if improved levels of self-care are to be attained. The design of epinephrine auto-injectors should also receive attention as patients often fail to carry them owing to size and aesthetics.
© 2012 Nordic College of Caring Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22834703     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01045.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci        ISSN: 0283-9318


  11 in total

1.  How far from correct is the use of adrenaline auto-injectors? A survey in Italian patients.

Authors:  Erminia Ridolo; Marcello Montagni; Laura Bonzano; Eleonora Savi; Silvia Peveri; Maria Teresa Costantino; Mariangiola Crivellaro; Giuseppina Manzotti; Carlo Lombardi; Marco Caminati; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Gianenrico Senna
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Occupational therapists' views on using a virtual reality interior design application within the pre-discharge home visit process.

Authors:  Anita Atwal; Arthur Money; Michele Harvey
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Patient perceptions and expectations of an anticoagulation service: a quantitative comparison study of clinic-based testers and patient self-testers.

Authors:  Arthur G Money; Julie Barnett; Jasna Kuljis; Debbie Duffin
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2015-02-16

4.  Efficacy of a Novel Prefilled, Single-Use, Needle-Free Device (Zeneo®) in Achieving Intramuscular Agent Delivery: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Marc Bardou; Maxime Luu; Paul Walker; Christophe Auriel; Xavière Castano
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  Update on the usage and safety of epinephrine auto-injectors, 2017.

Authors:  Larry S Posner; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2017-03-21

6.  Improving adrenaline autoinjector adherence: A psychologically informed training for healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Béré Mahoney; Elaine Walklet; Eleanor Bradley; Steve O'Hickey
Journal:  Immun Inflamm Dis       Date:  2019-07-09

Review 7.  Use of Virtual Reality Technology to Support the Home Modification Process: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Na-Kyoung Hwang; Sun-Hwa Shim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Living with severe allergy: an Anaphylaxis Campaign national survey of young people.

Authors:  Allison Worth; Lynne Regent; Mark Levy; Carey Ledford; Mandy East; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.871

9.  Transjecting growth hormone: continuous nightmare or controlled nuisance? Evaluation of a new needle-free device.

Authors:  Ad A Kaptein
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  A qualitative study exploring parents' experiences with epinephrine use for their child's anaphylactic reaction.

Authors:  Rishma Chooniedass; Beverley Temple; Donna Martin; Allan Becker
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 5.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.