Literature DB >> 22833465

Micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy comparisons of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments used with reciprocating motion.

Hee-Chul Kim1, You-Jeong Hwang, Da-Woon Jung, Sung-Yeop You, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, WooCheol Lee.   

Abstract

The single-file root canal instrumentation technique using reciprocating motion has been gaining concern. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the shaping ability of single ProTaper F2 file and WaveOne Primary file when they were used in the curved root canal with reciprocation motion and to investigate the durability of the file after use with a scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Changes in structure model index (SMI), root canal volume, curvature, surface area, and degree of transportation were measured from the cross-sectional images of the prepared canals using the micro-CT system with an isotropic resolution of 16 μm. Results showed that there were no differences in the changes of root canal volume, surface area, and SMI between the two file groups after the preparation (p > 0.05). The ProTaper group showed a curvature straightening value of 25.45 ± 12.51%, while the WaveOne group showed 27.30 ± 10.91%, and there was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). The transportation values between the two groups showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). SEM revealed that 60% of ProTaper files showed initiation of microcracks on the surface while those were detected on the only one WaveOne file. The single-file technique using either WaveOne Primary or ProTaper F2 can be safely used under each reciprocating motion without creating an increased apical transportation in curved canals. However, the metallurgic property resists cyclic fatigue was more favorable with WaveOne under the scanning evaluation. © Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22833465     DOI: 10.1002/sca.21039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scanning        ISSN: 0161-0457            Impact factor:   1.932


  9 in total

1.  Metallurgical analysis and fatigue resistance of WaveOne and ProTaper nickel-titanium instruments.

Authors:  Chiara Pirani; Oddone Ruggeri; Pier Paolo Cirulli; Gian Andrea Pelliccioni; Maria Giovanna Gandolfi; Carlo Prati
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Comparison of Postoperative Pain after Root Canal Preparation with Two Reciprocating and Rotary Single-File Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Narges Farhad Mollashahi; Eshagh Ali Saberi; Seyed Rohollah Havaei; Mohammad Sabeti
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2017

3.  Cervical Dentin Changes in Curved Root Canals after Using WaveOne and Reciproc Files with Full Rotation versus Reciprocation Movement: An Ex vivo Study.

Authors:  Yazdan Shantiaee; Golnaz Nahvi; Omid Dianat; Farzad Aghdashi
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

4.  Shaping ability of the profile 25/0.06 and protaper F2 in rotary motion, and reciproc in simulated canals.

Authors:  Gül Çelik; Murat Maden; Ahmet Savgat; Hikmet Orhan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.

Authors:  Balakrishnan Bakthavatchalam; Muthukrishnan Sudharshana Ranjani; Krishnan Amudhalakshmi
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

6.  Microtomographic Evaluation of Canal Centralization and Dentine Removal after Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems: HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next.

Authors:  Vivian Ronquete; Alexandre Sigrist de Martin; Karin Zuim; Thais Machado de Carvalho Coutinho; Eduardo Fagury Videira Marceliano; Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro Goulart; Ricardo Tadeu Lopes; Carlos Eduardo Da Silveira Bueno; Marília Fagury Videira Marceliano-Alves
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2022-01-11

7.  Centering Ability and Influence of Experience When Using WaveOne Single-File Technique in Simulated Canals.

Authors:  Mathieu Goldberg; Sandrine Dahan; Pierre Machtou
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-10-16

8.  Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape, Reciproc, and WaveOne: An in vitro comparative study.

Authors:  Alberto Dagna; Claudio Poggio; Riccardo Beltrami; Marco Colombo; Marco Chiesa; Stefano Bianchi
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-05

9.  Influence of glide path size and operating kinetics on time to reach working length and fracture resistance of Twisted File adaptive and Endostar E3 nickel-titanium file systems.

Authors:  Tamilkumaran Ramyadharshini; Inbaraj Anand Sherwood; V Shanmugham Vigneshwar; Prakasam Ernest Prince; Murugadoss Vaanjay
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2020-03-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.