Literature DB >> 22833247

Prevalence of isolates with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility in orthopedic device-related infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

P Vaudaux1, T Ferry, I Uçkay, P François, J Schrenzel, S Harbarth, A Renzoni.   

Abstract

We evaluated, by an improved susceptibility testing method, the prevalence and significance of low-level glycopeptide resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates, which belonged to a previously described, retrospective cohort of patients treated for orthopedic device-related infections (ODRI) at the Geneva University Hospital between 2000 and 2008. Fifty-seven individual or multiple isolates were retrieved from 41 ODRI patients for glycopeptide susceptibility and clonality studies, including 20 patients with prosthetic joint (PJ) and 21 with osteosynthesis (OS) MRSA infections. Low-level glycopeptide resistance was detected by elevated teicoplanin or/and vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs ≥ 4 mg/L), as determined by a previously validated combination of macrodilution and agar dilution assays of improved sensitivity. MRSA isolates with elevated teicoplanin MICs were detected in 20/41 (49 %) ODRI patients at the onset or during the course of glycopeptide therapy, namely, in 10 of 20 patients with PJ and 10 of 21 patients with OS infections. Only one isolate developed a concomitant increase in vancomycin MIC during therapy. 13/20 (65 %) glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA)-infected patients, including 7/10 (70 %) with PJ and 6/10 (60 %) with OS, experienced treatment failure. In contrast, therapy failed in only 5/21 (24 %) ODRI patients with non-GISA isolates (p = 0.012), including 2/10 (20 %) with PJ and 3/11 (27 %) with OS infections. The emergence of low-level teicoplanin resistance could not be explained by teicoplanin administration, since only four patients received teicoplanin. The evaluation of low-level teicoplanin resistance may improve the detection of GISA isolates. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of low-level teicoplanin resistance on the outcome of glycopeptide therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22833247     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-012-1705-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  43 in total

1.  Phenotypic antibiotic tolerance of Staphylococcus aureus in implant-related infections: relationship with in vitro colonization of artificial surfaces.

Authors:  P Vaudaux
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 18.500

2.  Risk factors for treatment failure in orthopedic device-related methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  T Ferry; I Uçkay; P Vaudaux; P François; J Schrenzel; S Harbarth; F Laurent; L Bernard; F Vandenesch; J Etienne; P Hoffmeyer; D Lew
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Decreased susceptibility to antibiotic killing of a stable small colony variant of Staphylococcus aureus in fluid phase and on fibronectin-coated surfaces.

Authors:  C Chuard; P E Vaudaux; R A Proctor; D P Lew
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Use of an automated multiple-locus, variable-number tandem repeat-based method for rapid and high-throughput genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Authors:  Patrice Francois; Antoine Huyghe; Yvan Charbonnier; Manuela Bento; Sébastien Herzig; Ivan Topolski; Bénédicte Fleury; Daniel Lew; Pierre Vaudaux; Stephan Harbarth; Willem van Leeuwen; Alex van Belkum; Dominique S Blanc; Didier Pittet; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  Pamela A Moise-Broder; Alan Forrest; Mary C Birmingham; Jerome J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a new model of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  K Hiramatsu
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 25.071

7.  Vancomycin in vitro bactericidal activity and its relationship to efficacy in clearance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Pamela A Moise; George Sakoulas; Alan Forrest; Jerome J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  George Sakoulas; Pamela A Moise-Broder; Jerome Schentag; Alan Forrest; Robert C Moellering; George M Eliopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Point: Vancomycin is not obsolete for the treatment of infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  John F Mohr; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Teicoplanin alone or combined with rifampin compared with vancomycin for prophylaxis and treatment of experimental foreign body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H J Schaad; C Chuard; P Vaudaux; F A Waldvogel; D P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  6 in total

1.  Heterogeneous glycopeptide intermediate Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  S Tevell; C Claesson; B Hellmark; B Söderquist; Å Nilsdotter-Augustinsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Increased risk of joint failure in hip prostheses infected with Staphylococcus aureus treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention compared to Streptococcus.

Authors:  Michael Betz; Sophie Abrassart; Pierre Vaudaux; Ergys Gjika; Maximilian Schindler; Julien Billières; Besa Zenelaj; Domizio Suvà; Robin Peter; Ilker Uçkay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Staphylococcal protein A promotes osteoclastogenesis through MAPK signaling during bone infection.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Xin Liu; Ce Dou; Zhen Cao; Chuan Liu; Shiwu Dong; Jun Fei
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 4.  Aggressive Early Debridement in Treatment of Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Hip and Knee Replacements.

Authors:  Andrea Volpin; Mohamed Sukeik; Sulaiman Alazzawi; Fares Sami Haddad
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-11-30

5.  In Vitro Evaluation of Gentamicin or Vancomycin Containing Bone Graft Substitute in the Prevention of Orthopedic Implant-Related Infections.

Authors:  Alessandro Bidossi; Marta Bottagisio; Nicola Logoluso; Elena De Vecchi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Epidemiology of Vancomycin-Intermediate and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Isolates.

Authors:  Shanshan Zhang; Xiaoxi Sun; Wenjiao Chang; Yuanyuan Dai; Xiaoling Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.