Literature DB >> 22832845

Ecosystem classifications based on summer and winter conditions.

Margaret E Andrew1, Trisalyn A Nelson, Michael A Wulder, George W Hobart, Nicholas C Coops, Carson J Q Farmer.   

Abstract

Ecosystem classifications map an area into relatively homogenous units for environmental research, monitoring, and management. However, their effectiveness is rarely tested. Here, three classifications are (1) defined and characterized for Canada along summertime productivity (moderate-resolution imaging spectrometer fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation) and wintertime snow conditions (special sensor microwave/imager snow water equivalent), independently and in combination, and (2) comparatively evaluated to determine the ability of each classification to represent the spatial and environmental patterns of alternative schemes, including the Canadian ecozone framework. All classifications depicted similar patterns across Canada, but detailed class distributions differed. Class spatial characteristics varied with environmental conditions within classifications, but were comparable between classifications. There was moderate correspondence between classifications. The strongest association was between productivity classes and ecozones. The classification along both productivity and snow balanced these two sets of variables, yielding intermediate levels of association in all pairwise comparisons. Despite relatively low spatial agreement between classifications, they successfully captured patterns of the environmental conditions underlying alternate schemes (e.g., snow classes explained variation in productivity and vice versa). The performance of ecosystem classifications and the relevance of their input variables depend on the environmental patterns and processes used for applications and evaluation. Productivity or snow regimes, as constructed here, may be desirable when summarizing patterns controlled by summer- or wintertime conditions, respectively, or of climate change responses. General purpose ecosystem classifications should include both sets of drivers. Classifications should be carefully, quantitatively, and comparatively evaluated relative to a particular application prior to their implementation as monitoring and assessment frameworks.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22832845     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-2773-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  21 in total

1.  Multivariate analysis of the ecoregion delineation for aquatic systems.

Authors:  G Darrel Jenerette; Jay Lee; David W Waller; Robert E Carlson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Macroinvertebrate regionalisation for use in the management of aquatic ecosystems in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  F Wells; L Metzeling; P Newall
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  The development of biological objectives for streams in a single catchment: a case study on the catchment of Western Port Bay, Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Jan L Barton; Leon Metzeling
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Species-energy relationships at the macroecological scale: a review of the mechanisms.

Authors:  Karl L Evans; Philip H Warren; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-02

5.  Satellite-observed photosynthetic trends across boreal North America associated with climate and fire disturbance.

Authors:  Scott J Goetz; Andrew G Bunn; Gregory J Fiske; R A Houghton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Identifying ecoregion boundaries.

Authors:  Robert G Bailey
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Topographic, bioclimatic, and vegetation characteristics of three ecoregion classification systems in North America: comparisons along continent-wide transects.

Authors:  Robert S Thompson; Sarah L Shafer; Katherine H Anderson; Laura E Strickland; Richard T Pelltier; Patrick J Bartlein; Michael W Kerwin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Toward a scientifically rigorous basis for developing mapped ecological regions.

Authors:  Gerard McMahon; Ed B Wiken; David A Gauthier
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Genecological variation corresponding to Forest Ecosystem Classification vegetation and soil types for jack pine and black spruce from northwestern Ontario.

Authors:  W H Parker; A Van Niejenhuis; J Ward
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Drier summers cancel out the CO2 uptake enhancement induced by warmer springs.

Authors:  A Angert; S Biraud; C Bonfils; C C Henning; W Buermann; J Pinzon; C J Tucker; I Fung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  1 in total

1.  Remotely-sensed productivity clusters capture global biodiversity patterns.

Authors:  Nicholas C Coops; Sean P Kearney; Douglas K Bolton; Volker C Radeloff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.