Literature DB >> 22832724

Effective penile block for circumcision in adults.

Ercan Malkoc1, Ferhat Ates, Sami Uguz, Furkan Dursun, Fuat Can, Kadir Baykal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The dorsal nerve block of the penis during circumcision has not been standardized and the effectiveness of the block can be changeable. The aim of this study was to determine which technique is more suitable for blocking sensory innervations of penis.
METHODS: This prospective study was done on adults who voluntarily applied to be circumcised. Patients were randomized into three distinctive groups; first, just circular infiltration; second, circular plus dorsal penile infiltration; and third, circular plus ventral upward infiltration. Sensation was tested using pinprick sensory testing before and after infiltration. The total duration of the procedure was recorded.
RESULTS: In total, 89 adult uncircumcised men were included into the study. The average age of men was 21.4 (min: 20; max: 25). The average operation time in the third group was significantly shorter. The sensation distribution, especially around the frenulum sensitivity results were in the first minute 100, 81.3, 72.4 %; in the third minute 85.7, 37.5, 20.7 %; and in the fifth minute 57.1, 18.8, and 0 % for the first, second, and third group, respectively. In the fifth minute, there was no sensitivity for any patients in the third group and it was significant.
CONCLUSION: Circular plus ventral upward anesthesia is an easy and feasible technique for local anesthesia in circumcision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22832724     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-012-0195-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  19 in total

1.  Religious circumcision and the Human Rights Act.

Authors:  A R Gatrad; A Sheikh; H Jacks
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  An unusual complication of dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision.

Authors:  Ayhan Abaci; Balahan Makay; Erbil Unsal; Olguner Mustafa; Tanju Aktug
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.556

3.  Significantly increased complication risks with mass circumcisions.

Authors:  E Ozdemir
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1997-07

4.  Nerve block of the penis for postoperative pain relief in children.

Authors:  M G Soliman; N A Tremblay
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Penile block for postoperative pain relief in penile surgery.

Authors:  F J Goulding
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Anesthesia for neonatal circumcision: local anesthesia is better than dorsal penile nerve block.

Authors:  A L Masciello
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Identification of communicating branches among the dorsal, perineal and cavernous nerves of the penis.

Authors:  Selcuk Yucel; Laurence S Baskin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Penile block in children, our first experience.

Authors:  B Telgarsky; D Karovic; O Wassermann; E Ogibovicova; D Csomor; J Koppl; K Slobodnikova; B Podhoransky; M Brenner; R Liscak; P Gasparec; V Polak; J Trnka; T Sagat; H Trimmel
Journal:  Bratisl Lek Listy       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.278

9.  Neonatal circumcision and penile dorsal nerve block--a painless procedure.

Authors:  C Kirya; M W Werthmann
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Caudal anaesthesia as a treatment for penile ischaemia following circumcision.

Authors:  S Kaplanian; N A Chambers; I Forsyth
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.