Literature DB >> 22832475

Perceived barriers, benefits, and motives for physical activity: two primary-care physical activity prescription programs.

Asmita Patel1, Grant M Schofield, Gregory S Kolt, W L Keogh J.   

Abstract

This study examined whether perceived barriers, benefits, and motives for physical activity differed based on allocation to 2 different types of primary-care activity-prescription programs (pedometer-based vs. time-based Green Prescription). Eighty participants from the Healthy Steps study completed a questionnaire that assessed their perceived barriers, benefits, and motives for physical activity. Factor analysis was carried out to identify common themes of barriers, benefits, and motives for physical activity. Factor scores were then used to explore between-groups differences for perceived barriers, benefits, and motives based on group allocation and demographic variables. No significant differences were found in factor scores based on allocation. Demographic variables relating to the existence of chronic health conditions, weight status, and older age were found to significantly influence perceived barriers, benefits, and motives for physical activity. Findings suggest that the addition of a pedometer to the standard Green Prescription does not appear to increase perceived motives or benefits or decrease perceived barriers for physical activity in low-active older adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22832475     DOI: 10.1123/japa.21.1.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aging Phys Act        ISSN: 1063-8652            Impact factor:   1.961


  7 in total

1.  Assessing the Effects of Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Behavior Change Strategies on Physical Activity in Older Adults: a Factorial Experiment.

Authors:  Siobhan K McMahon; Beth Lewis; J Michael Oakes; Jean F Wyman; Weihua Guan; Alexander J Rothman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2017-06

Review 2.  Sport and ageing: a systematic review of the determinants and trends of participation in sport for older adults.

Authors:  Claire R Jenkin; Rochelle M Eime; Hans Westerbeek; Grant O'Sullivan; Jannique G Z van Uffelen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Area-level and individual correlates of active transportation among adults in Germany: A population-based multilevel study.

Authors:  J D Finger; G Varnaccia; L Gabrys; J Hoebel; L E Kroll; S Krug; K Manz; S E Baumeister; G B M Mensink; C Lange; M F Leitzmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  A systematic review of barriers and motivators to physical activity in elderly adults in Iran and worldwide.

Authors:  Soudabeh Yarmohammadi; Hossein Mozafar Saadati; Mohtasham Ghaffari; Ali Ramezankhani
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2019-11-29

5.  A pedometer-based walking intervention with and without email counseling in general practice: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tomas Vetrovsky; Jozef Cupka; Martin Dudek; Blanka Kuthanova; Klaudia Vetrovska; Vaclav Capek; Vaclav Bunc
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Functionality of Physical Activity Referral Schemes (PARS): A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francis Ali Albert; Melissa J Crowe; Aduli E O Malau-Aduli; Bunmi S Malau-Aduli
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-06-25

7.  Effect of Electronic Activity Monitors and Pedometers on Health: Results from the TAME Health Pilot Randomized Pragmatic Trial.

Authors:  Zakkoyya H Lewis; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Steve R Fisher; Kristofer Jennings; Arleen F Brown; Maria C Swartz; Eloisa Martinez; Elizabeth J Lyons
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.