Literature DB >> 22832086

Using Amazon's Mechanical Turk website to measure accuracy of body size estimation and body dissatisfaction.

Rick M Gardner1, Dana L Brown, Russell Boice.   

Abstract

This study investigated Amazon.com's website Mechanical Turk (MTurk) as a research tool for measuring body size estimation and dissatisfaction. 160 U.S. participants completed the BIAS-BD figural drawing scale and demographic questions posted on the MTurk website. The BIAS-BD consists of 17 drawings of various male and female body sizes based on anthropometric data corresponding to a range of 60% below to 140% above the average U.S. adult. Respondents selected a drawing that best reflected their current size and ideal size. Results revealed that respondents overestimated their body size by 6% and desired an ideal size 9.2% smaller than their perceived size. Findings are compared with three previous studies using the BIAS-BD scale. A general correspondence in findings between the four studies was found. We conclude that the MTurk can serve as a viable method for collecting data on the perceptual and attitudinal aspects of body image quickly and inexpensively.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22832086     DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Body Image        ISSN: 1740-1445


  15 in total

1.  Development of the Healthcare Triggering Questionnaire in adult sexual abuse survivors.

Authors:  Julie B Schnur; William F Chaplin; Kiran Khurshid; Jazmin N Mogavero; Rachel E Goldsmith; Young-Sun Lee; Leib Litman; Guy H Montgomery
Journal:  Psychol Trauma       Date:  2017-04-27

2.  Self-assessed performance improves statistical fusion of image labels.

Authors:  Frederick W Bryan; Zhoubing Xu; Andrew J Asman; Wade M Allen; Daniel S Reich; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Social identity and drinking: Dissecting social networks and implications for novel interventions.

Authors:  Clayton Neighbors; Heather Krieger; Lindsey M Rodriguez; Dipali V Rinker; Jordanna M Lembo
Journal:  J Prev Interv Community       Date:  2019-05-22

4.  Parents' perceptions of parent-child interactions related to eating and body image: an experimental vignette study.

Authors:  Janet A Lydecker; Paige M Cunningham; Elizabeth O'Brien; Carlos M Grilo
Journal:  Eat Disord       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  Transgender and gender non-conforming adult preparedness for aging: Concerns for aging, and familiarity with and engagement in planning behaviors.

Authors:  Richard S Henry; Paul B Perrin; Bethany M Coston; Tarynn M Witten
Journal:  Int J Transgend Health       Date:  2019-11-13

Review 6.  Comparing Amazon's Mechanical Turk Platform to Conventional Data Collection Methods in the Health and Medical Research Literature.

Authors:  Karoline Mortensen; Taylor L Hughes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Opportunity costs of reward delays and the discounting of hypothetical money and cigarettes.

Authors:  Patrick S Johnson; Evan S Herrmann; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Sun Protection Belief Clusters: Analysis of Amazon Mechanical Turk Data.

Authors:  Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Julie B Schnur; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  An online daily diary study of alcohol use using Amazon's Mechanical Turk.

Authors:  Marcella H Boynton; Laura Smart Richman
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2014-06-03

10.  Crowdsourcing awareness: exploration of the ovarian cancer knowledge gap through Amazon Mechanical Turk.

Authors:  Rebecca R Carter; Analisa DiFeo; Kath Bogie; Guo-Qiang Zhang; Jiayang Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.