Literature DB >> 22830667

Visual search for features and conjunctions following declines in the useful field of view.

Joshua D Cosman1, Monica N Lees, John D Lee, Matthew Rizzo, Shaun P Vecera.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND/STUDY CONTEXT: Typical measures for assessing the useful field (UFOV) of view involve many components of attention. The objective of the current experiment was to examine differences in visual search efficiency for older individuals with and without UFOV impairment.
METHODS: The authors used a computerized screening instrument to assess the useful field of view and to characterize participants as having an impaired or normal UFOV. Participants also performed two visual search tasks, a feature search (e.g., search for a green target among red distractors) or a conjunction search (e.g., a green target with a gap on its left or right side among red distractors with gaps on the left or right and green distractors with gaps on the top or bottom).
RESULTS: Visual search performance did not differ between UFOV impaired and unimpaired individuals when searching for a basic feature. However, search efficiency was lower for impaired individuals than unimpaired individuals when searching for a conjunction of features.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that UFOV decline in normal aging is associated with conjunction search. This finding suggests that the underlying cause of UFOV decline may arise from an overall decline in attentional efficiency. Because the useful field of view is a reliable predictor of driving safety, the results suggest that decline in the everyday visual behavior of older adults might arise from attentional declines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22830667      PMCID: PMC3823497          DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2012.699370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  18 in total

1.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

2.  The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons.

Authors:  Artem V Belopolsky; Laura Zwaan; Jan Theeuwes; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

3.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: examination of the useful field of view.

Authors:  C T Scialfa; D W Kline; B J Lyman
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1987-03

6.  Visual localization: age and practice.

Authors:  R Sekuler; K Ball
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Some aspects of the selective process in the functional visual field.

Authors:  A F Sanders
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karlene Ball; Daniel B Berch; Karin F Helmers; Jared B Jobe; Mary D Leveck; Michael Marsiske; John N Morris; George W Rebok; David M Smith; Sharon L Tennstedt; Frederick W Unverzagt; Sherry L Willis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Adult age differences in the time course of inhibition of return.

Authors:  Alan D Castel; Alison L Chasteen; Charles T Scialfa; Jay Pratt
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Vision impairment, eye disease, and injurious motor vehicle crashes in the elderly.

Authors:  C Owsley; G McGwin; K Ball
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.648

View more
  3 in total

1.  Micro and regular saccades across the lifespan during a visual search of "Where's Waldo" puzzles.

Authors:  Nicholas L Port; Jane Trimberger; Steve Hitzeman; Bryan Redick; Stephen Beckerman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Active Listening Delays Attentional Disengagement and Saccadic Eye Movements.

Authors:  Benjamin D Lester; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

3.  Visual processing speed.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 1.886

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.