Literature DB >> 22830325

Medical student perspective: working toward specific and actionable clinical clerkship feedback.

Haley A Moss1, Peter B Derman, R Carter Clement.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Feedback on the wards is an important component of medical student education. Medical schools have incorporated formalized feedback mechanisms such as clinical encounter cards and standardized patient encounters into clinical curricula. However, the system could be further improved as medical students frequently feel uncomfortable requesting feedback, and are often dissatisfied with the quality of the feedback they receive. AIMS: This article explores the shortcomings of the existing medical student feedback system and examines the relevant literature in an effort to shed light on areas in which the system can be enhanced. The discussion focuses on resident-provided feedback but is broadly applicable to delivering feedback in general.
METHODS: A review of the organizational psychology and business administration literature on fostering effective feedback was performed. These insights were then applied to the setting of medical education.
RESULTS: Providing effective feedback requires training and forethought. Feedback itself should be specific and actionable.
CONCLUSION: Utilizing these strategies will help medical students and educators get the most out of existing feedback systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22830325     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.687849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  3 in total

1.  The Quality of Written Feedback by Attendings of Internal Medicine Residents.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson; Cynthia Kay; Wilkins C Jackson; Michael Frank
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Identifying educator behaviours for high quality verbal feedback in health professions education: literature review and expert refinement.

Authors:  Christina E Johnson; Jennifer L Keating; David J Boud; Megan Dalton; Debra Kiegaldie; Margaret Hay; Barry McGrath; Wendy A McKenzie; Kichu Balakrishnan R Nair; Debra Nestel; Claire Palermo; Elizabeth K Molloy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Feedback Quality Using an Observation Form.

Authors:  Gary L Beck Dallaghan; Joy Higgins; Adam Reinhardt
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2018-05-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.