| Literature DB >> 22829815 |
P Bhatter1, A Chatterjee, N Mistry.
Abstract
India and China are two Asian super-powers with developing economies carried on the shoulders of their booming populations. This growth can only be sustained by nurturing their "human resource". However increasing reports of insufficient public health (PH) initiatives in India when compared to the aggressive PH system of China may prove to be the Achilles' heels for India. This review compares the PH system in India and China for combating Tuberculosis (TB), the disease responsible for maximum mortality and morbidity by a single infectious agent. While China has acknowledged the disease load and thereafter has methodically improved its reporting, detection, diagnosis and treatment, India is still in denial of the imminent health risk. The Indian PH system still considers TB as a "facultative" disease for which the required control measures are already in place and functioning. Globally, India and China recorded the highest Multi-Drug Resistant TB (MDR) cases notified in 2010 (64000 and 63000, respectively). Additionally non-government sources reported extremely high proportions of MDR in India. Here we have compared the medical, social and economic approaches of the two nations towards better management and control of TB. Does India have lessons to learn from China?Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22829815 PMCID: PMC3398628 DOI: 10.1155/2012/625459
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis ISSN: 1687-708X
Microbiology facilities 2010 (adapted from WHO report 2009) [2].
| Laboratories | India | China |
|---|---|---|
| Smear (/100000 population) | 1.1 | 0.2 |
| Culture (/5 million population) | 0.1 | 3.5 |
| DST (/10 million population) | 0.2 | 1.2 |
Figure 1Reports of counterfeit drugs by therapeutic class received by WHO between 1999 and 2002, adapted from International policy network repost [4]. Prevalence of fake medicines is seen across all classes of drugs, a large proportion of them being antibiotics.
Size and characteristics of private TB market, adapted from Wells 2011.
| Country | Incident cases (2008) | Coverage by first line private sector drugs* | % change in volume 2004–9 | % of private market that is loose drugs | Number of manufacturers with 0.3% of private first line market share | Fluoroquinolone coverage of incident MDR-TB cases# | Fluoroquinolone coverage of all incident cases& |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| India | 1,982,628 | 117% | −3 | 23% | 6 | 41% | 6.1% |
| China | 1,301,322 | 23% | 59 | 98% | 9 |
*% of all incident cases that can be treated by first line drugs in private market (average across 4 first line drugs, assuming daily 6–8 month regimen). Data for this and other columns, unless noted, are for Q4 2008–Q3 2009.
#Assuming daily dosing for 18 month regimen, and no use for drug-sensitive TB.
&Assuming daily dosing for 6 month regimen, and no diagnosis of drug-resistant TB.