Literature DB >> 22829489

Assessing the validity of quality indicators: keep the context in mind!

Diana M J Delnoij, Gert P Westert.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22829489     DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cks086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  The effectiveness of providing peer benchmarked feedback to hip replacement surgeons based on patient-reported outcome measures--results from the PROFILE (Patient-Reported Outcomes: Feedback Interpretation and Learning Experiment) trial: a cluster randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Maria B Boyce; John P Browne
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Using quality measures for quality improvement: the perspective of hospital staff.

Authors:  Asgar Aghaei Hashjin; Hamid Ravaghi; Dionne S Kringos; Uzor C Ogbu; Claudia Fischer; Saeid Reza Azami; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Surgeon's experiences of receiving peer benchmarked feedback using patient-reported outcome measures: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Maria B Boyce; John P Browne; Joanne Greenhalgh
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Development and testing of Australian prehospital care quality indicators: study protocol.

Authors:  Robin Pap; Craig Lockwood; Matthew Stephenson; Paul Simpson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.