Literature DB >> 22829415

Medical students' attitude towards rheumatology training at foundation years' level in the UK and rationale behind the students' choice: results from a national survey.

Muryum Thapper1, Euthalia Roussou.   

Abstract

The aims are to assess whether medical students are interested in rheumatology as a training post during post-medical-school and prior to specialty training that is covered by foundation years (FY) training in the UK, to determine the time spent in the undergraduate training in rheumatology and whether the desire for musculoskeletal (MsK) medicine training (rheumatology and orthopaedics taken together) is enhanced during FY training and to analyse the rationale behind their choice for rheumatology alone or combined with orthopaedics. An online questionnaire was distributed to all 31 UK medical schools, addressed to fourth-, fifth- and sixth-year medical students. The questionnaire was completed by 256 students from 11 of 31 medical schools existed in the UK in 2009. Most respondents (n = 156; 60.9 %) received 3 weeks (96 h) exposure to rheumatology, whilst one-fifth (n = 53; 20.7 %) had received no exposure in rheumatology. A total of 122 students of the 256 that responded (47.6 %) would like to do rheumatology as part of their training and 116 (45.3 %) would like to have more posts available in rheumatology. However, when asked to choose 6 specialties, out of 21, which would be most useful for post-university training, rheumatology was amongst the bottom three, attracting only 9.4 % of respondent students. A total of 68 of 256 (26.5 %) students, however, expressed a desire for MsK medicine: 44/256 (17.1 %) for orthopaedics and 24/256 (9.4 %) for rheumatology. From a total of 49 of 256 (19.1 %) open-ended responses obtained, 25 (51 %) were from those medical students willing to have exposure in MsK medicine: 15 of 44 (34 %) willing to have orthopaedics and 10 of 24 (41.6 %) willing to have rheumatology. Analysis of the responses revealed that it is mostly the specialty choice that guides towards specialty training. One in five of the medical students responded to had received (actual or perceived) no exposure to rheumatology during their undergraduate years. Career choice that derived mostly from undergraduate exposure is the driving force behind medical students' choice for foundation year training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22829415     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-012-2482-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  9 in total

1.  Undergraduate rheumatology teaching in the UK: a survey of current practice and changes since 1990. Arthritis Research Campaign Undergraduate Working Party of the ARC Education Sub-committee.

Authors:  L J Kay; C M Deighton; D J Walker; E M Hay
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  Educational deficiencies in musculoskeletal medicine.

Authors:  Kevin B Freedman; Joseph Bernstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Variation by medical school in career choices of UK graduates of 1999 and 2000.

Authors:  Michael J Goldacre; Gill Turner; Trevor W Lambert
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 4.  Subspecialty choice: why did you become a rheumatologist?

Authors:  Sharon L Kolasinski; Anne R Bass; Gwendolyn F Kane-Wanger; Bonita S Libman; Nora Sandorfi; Tammy Utset
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-12-15

5.  Why medical students switch careers: changing course during the preclinical years of medical school.

Authors:  Ian Scott; Margot C Gowans; Bruce Wright; Fraser Brenneis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Why do we choose rheumatology? Implications for future recruitment--results of the 2006 UK Trainee Survey.

Authors:  L Dunkley; A Filer; D Speden; D Bax; A Crisp
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  Career preferences of doctors who qualified in the United Kingdom in 1993 compared with those of doctors qualifying in 1974, 1977, 1980, and 1983.

Authors:  T W Lambert; M J Goldacre; C Edwards; J Parkhouse
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-06

8.  Greater focus on clinical rheumatology is required for training in internal medicine.

Authors:  Eoghan M McCarthy; Barry J Sheane; Gaye Cunnane
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Current teaching of paediatric musculoskeletal medicine within UK medical schools--a need for change.

Authors:  Sharmila Jandial; Tim Rapley; Helen Foster
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 7.580

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  To be or not to be rheumatologist: survey among Belgian medical students and internal medicine trainees: what do certified rheumatologists think about the current rheumatology training program?

Authors:  Ruth Wittoek; Herman Mielants
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.980

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.