Literature DB >> 22829198

Sample size determination in clinical trials with multiple co-primary endpoints including mixed continuous and binary variables.

Takashi Sozu1, Tomoyuki Sugimoto, Toshimitsu Hamasaki.   

Abstract

In the field of pharmaceutical drug development, there have been extensive discussions on the establishment of statistically significant results that demonstrate the efficacy of a new treatment with multiple co-primary endpoints. When designing a clinical trial with such multiple co-primary endpoints, it is critical to determine the appropriate sample size for indicating the statistical significance of all the co-primary endpoints with preserving the desired overall power because the type II error rate increases with the number of co-primary endpoints. We consider overall power functions and sample size determinations with multiple co-primary endpoints that consist of mixed continuous and binary variables, and provide numerical examples to illustrate the behavior of the overall power functions and sample sizes. In formulating the problem, we assume that response variables follow a multivariate normal distribution, where binary variables are observed in a dichotomized normal distribution with a certain point of dichotomy. Numerical examples show that the sample size decreases as the correlation increases when the individual powers of each endpoint are approximately and mutually equal.
© 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22829198     DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201100221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  10 in total

Review 1.  Design, data monitoring, and analysis of clinical trials with co-primary endpoints: A review.

Authors:  Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Scott R Evans; Koko Asakura
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Group-Sequential Strategies in Clinical Trials with Multiple Co-Primary Outcomes.

Authors:  Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Koko Asakura; Scott R Evans; Tomoyuki Sugimoto; Takashi Sozu
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.452

3.  Incorporating biomarkers to improve statistical power of immunotherapeutic neoadjuvant clinical trials in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Guoqiao Wang; Jingqin Luo; Jingxia Liu; Ling Chen; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 1.452

4.  Fundamentals and Catalytic Innovation: The Statistical and Data Management Center of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group.

Authors:  Jacqueline Huvane; Lauren Komarow; Carol Hill; Thuy Tien T Tran; Carol Pereira; Susan L Rosenkranz; Matt Finnemeyer; Michelle Earley; Hongyu Jeanne Jiang; Rui Wang; Judith Lok; Scott R Evans
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 5.  Review of pragmatic trials found that multiple primary outcomes are common but so too are discrepancies between protocols and final reports.

Authors:  Pascale Nevins; Shelley Vanderhout; Kelly Carroll; Stuart G Nicholls; Seana N Semchishen; Jamie C Brehaut; Dean A Fergusson; Bruno Giraudeau; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 7.407

6.  Sample size determination for clinical trials with co-primary outcomes: exponential event times.

Authors:  Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Tomoyuki Sugimoto; Scott Evans; Takashi Sozu
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 1.894

7.  The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mindfulness training programme in schools compared with normal school provision (MYRIAD): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Willem Kuyken; Elizabeth Nuthall; Sarah Byford; Catherine Crane; Tim Dalgleish; Tamsin Ford; Mark T Greenberg; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Russell M Viner; J Mark G Williams
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Sample size estimation using a latent variable model for mixed outcome co-primary, multiple primary and composite endpoints.

Authors:  Martina E McMenamin; Jessica K Barrett; Anna Berglind; James M S Wason
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Employing a latent variable framework to improve efficiency in composite endpoint analysis.

Authors:  Martina McMenamin; Jessica K Barrett; Anna Berglind; James Ms Wason
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Decision-making with multiple correlated binary outcomes in clinical trials.

Authors:  Xynthia Kavelaars; Joris Mulder; Maurits Kaptein
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.021

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.