Literature DB >> 22829179

A note on the derivation of epidemic final sizes.

Joel C Miller1.   

Abstract

Final size relations are known for many epidemic models. The derivations are often tedious and difficult, involving indirect methods to solve a system of integro-differential equations. Often when the details of the disease or population change, the final size relation does not. An alternate approach to deriving final sizes has been suggested. This approach directly considers the underlying stochastic process of the epidemic rather than the approximating deterministic equations and gives insight into why the relations hold. It has not been widely used. We suspect that this is because it appears to be less rigorous. In this article, we investigate this approach more fully and show that under very weak assumptions (which are satisfied in all conditions we are aware of for which final size relations exist) it can be made rigorous. In particular, the assumptions must hold whenever integro-differential equations exist, but they may also hold in cases without such equations. Thus, the use of integro-differential equations to find a final size relation is unnecessary and a simpler, more general method can be applied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22829179      PMCID: PMC3506030          DOI: 10.1007/s11538-012-9749-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  10 in total

1.  Dynamics of annual influenza A epidemics with immuno-selection.

Authors:  Viggo Andreasen
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Edge-based compartmental modelling for infectious disease spread.

Authors:  Joel C Miller; Anja C Slim; Erik M Volz
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations.

Authors:  O Diekmann; J A Heesterbeek; J A Metz
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Epidemic size and probability in populations with heterogeneous infectivity and susceptibility.

Authors:  Joel C Miller
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2007-07-10

5.  Second look at the spread of epidemics on networks.

Authors:  Eben Kenah; James M Robins
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2007-09-25

6.  A final size relation for epidemic models.

Authors:  Julien Arino; Fred Brauer; P van den Driessche; James Watmough; Jianhong Wu
Journal:  Math Biosci Eng       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.080

7.  Age-of-infection and the final size relation.

Authors:  Fred Brauer
Journal:  Math Biosci Eng       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.080

8.  The size of epidemics in populations with heterogeneous susceptibility.

Authors:  Guy Katriel
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  The final size of an epidemic and its relation to the basic reproduction number.

Authors:  Viggo Andreasen
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Generality of the final size formula for an epidemic of a newly invading infectious disease.

Authors:  Junling Ma; David J D Earn
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.758

  10 in total
  41 in total

1.  The relationships between message passing, pairwise, Kermack-McKendrick and stochastic SIR epidemic models.

Authors:  Robert R Wilkinson; Frank G Ball; Kieran J Sharkey
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  A primer on the use of probability generating functions in infectious disease modeling.

Authors:  Joel C Miller
Journal:  Infect Dis Model       Date:  2018-09-25

3.  Epidemic spread in networks: Existing methods and current challenges.

Authors:  Joel C Miller; Istvan Z Kiss
Journal:  Math Model Nat Phenom       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  R Markdown as a dynamic interface for teaching: Modules from math and biology classrooms.

Authors:  Kristine L Grayson; Angela K Hilliker; Joanna R Wares
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.935

5.  Using active matter to introduce spatial heterogeneity to the susceptible infected recovered model of epidemic spreading.

Authors:  P Forgács; A Libál; C Reichhardt; N Hengartner; C J O Reichhardt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Epidemiology of the silent polio outbreak in Rahat, Israel, based on modeling of environmental surveillance data.

Authors:  Andrew F Brouwer; Joseph N S Eisenberg; Connor D Pomeroy; Lester M Shulman; Musa Hindiyeh; Yossi Manor; Itamar Grotto; James S Koopman; Marisa C Eisenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cocirculation of infectious diseases on networks.

Authors:  Joel C Miller
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2013-06-20

8.  Estimating the per-exposure effect of infectious disease interventions.

Authors:  Justin J O'Hagan; Marc Lipsitch; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Impact of US vaccination strategy on COVID-19 wave dynamics.

Authors:  Corentin Cot; Giacomo Cacciapaglia; Anna Sigridur Islind; María Óskarsdóttir; Francesco Sannino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Mitigating outbreaks in congregate settings by decreasing the size of the susceptible population.

Authors:  Seth Blumberg; Phoebe Lu; Christopher M Hoover; James O Lloyd-Smith; Ada T Kwan; David Sears; Stefano M Bertozzi; Lee Worden
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.