Literature DB >> 22828892

Are genetic counselors and the social service system for people with intellectual disability reaching rapprochement?

Elliott W Simon1.   

Abstract

Recent advances in syndromic identification have resulted in genetic counselors providing services to increasing numbers of people with intellectual disability (ID) and their families. However, from the standpoint of professionals who support people with ID, genetic counselors are on the periphery of the extensive ID social service system. Reasons for this, based on a review of historical circumstances, definitional differences funding and a divergence of approaches, are critically presented and discussed. A model is offered that would allow for a closer working relationship and an integrated team approach that includes genetic counselors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22828892     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9525-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  12 in total

1.  Editorial: introduction to special section on the national fragile X survey.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2010-11

2.  Embracing the unique role of genetic counselors: response to the commentary by Madeo et al.

Authors:  K M Dent; C Harper; L Kearney; C Lieber; B Finucane
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 3.  The relationship between the genetic counseling profession and the disability community: a commentary.

Authors:  Anne C Madeo; Barbara B Biesecker; Campbell Brasington; Lori H Erby; Kathryn F Peters
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Developmental versus difference theories of mental retardation and the problem of motivation.

Authors:  E Zigler
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1969-01

Review 5.  Therapeutic implications of the mGluR theory of fragile X mental retardation.

Authors:  M F Bear
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.449

6.  Social role valorization: a proposed new term for the principle of normalization.

Authors:  W Wolfensberger
Journal:  Ment Retard       Date:  1983-12

Review 7.  Mental retardation's two cultures of behavioral research.

Authors:  R M Hodapp; E M Dykens
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1994-05

Review 8.  Genetics, mental retardation, and the forging of new alliances.

Authors:  Brenda Finucane; Barbara Haas-Givler; Elliott W Simon
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

9.  On the definition and classification of mental retardation.

Authors:  E Zigler; D Balla; R Hodapp
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1984-11

Review 10.  Familial mental retardation: a continuing dilemma.

Authors:  E Zigler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.