Literature DB >> 22828774

Clinical outcome after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in coronary bypass graft failure.

Ralf E Harskamp1, Marcel A Beijk, Peter Damman, Wichert J Kuijt, Pier Woudstra, Maik J Grundeken, Jaap J Kloek, Jan G Tijssen, Bas A de Mol, Robbert J de Winter.   

Abstract

AIMS: To describe long-term outcome following surgical and percutaneous revascularization in graft failure.
METHODS: We analyzed consecutive patients with graft failure after heart-team assignment to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between 2003 and 2008. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target vessel revascularization (TVR). Kaplan-Meier event rate estimates were calculated up to a 5-year follow-up. Independent predictors for outcomes were identified by backward selection in a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS: We identified 287 patients treated for graft failure: 243 with PCI and 44 with redo CABG. Patients undergoing PCI more frequently presented with ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) (P < 0.001), multivessel disease (P < 0.001), vein graft failure (P = 0.04), a history of MI (P < 0.001) and shorter time-to-graft failure (P = 0.001). Bare-metal stents (BMS) were used in 81.3% of the PCI-treated lesions and drug-eluting stents (DES) in 18.7%. The median follow-up was 3.9 years. Five-year rate of composite all-cause death, MI or TVR was 57.6% after PCI and 51% after CABG (P = 0.51). Repeat revascularization [TVR and target lesion revascularization (TLR)] was 30.7 and 21.3% after PCI, and 8.0 and 3.2% following CABG (P = 0.009; P = 0.008). In the PCI group, BMS was associated with higher rates of TVR (35.1 vs. 12.6%; P = 0.04) and TLR (24.8 vs. 7.6%; P = 0.04), but similar rate of death or MI compared with DES. Independent predictors for the primary outcome were creatinine [hazard ratio 1.008 per μmol/l, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.005-1.011, P < 0.001] and peak creatine kinase MB (hazard ratio 1.001 per U/l, 95% CI 1.000-1.002, P = 0.027).
CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes are similarly poor after heart-team triage for surgical or percutaneous intervention in patients with graft failure. Repeat revascularization occurred more frequent after PCI, particularly following BMS implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22828774     DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328356a4fc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 1558-2027            Impact factor:   2.160


  8 in total

Review 1.  Status quo of hybrid coronary revascularization for multi-vessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ralf E Harskamp; Zhe Zheng; John H Alexander; Judson B Williams; Ying Xian; Michael E Halkos; J Matthew Brennan; Robbert J de Winter; Peter K Smith; Renato D Lopes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Efficient gene transfer and durable transgene expression in grafted rabbit veins.

Authors:  Liang Du; Jingwan Zhang; Alexander W Clowes; David A Dichek
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.695

Review 3.  Management and Prevention of Saphenous Vein Graft Failure: A Review.

Authors:  Peter McKavanagh; Bobby Yanagawa; George Zawadowski; Asim Cheema
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2017-07-26

Review 4.  Non-invasive Ischaemia Testing in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Technical Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Andreas Seraphim; Kristopher D Knott; Joao B Augusto; Katia Menacho; Sara Tyebally; Benjamin Dowsing; Sanjeev Bhattacharyya; Leon J Menezes; Daniel A Jones; Rakesh Uppal; James C Moon; Charlotte Manisty
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-23

5.  One-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in native coronary arteries versus saphenous vein grafts in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Amr Abdelrahman; Maciej Dębski; Ranjit More; Hesham K Abdelaziz; Tawfiqur Choudhury; Jonas Eichhofer; Billal Patel
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 6.  Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the era of Advanced PCI.

Authors:  Ter-Er Kusu-Orkar; Kellan Masharani; Amer Harky; Andrew D Muir
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-08-16

Review 7.  Diagnostic and Management Strategies in Patients with Late Recurrent Angina after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Ruben W de Winter; Mohammed S Rahman; Pepijn A van Diemen; Stefan P Schumacher; Ruurt A Jukema; Yvemarie B O Somsen; Albert C van Rossum; Niels J Verouden; Ibrahim Danad; Ronak Delewi; Alexander Nap; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.955

Review 8.  Advances in the Post-coronary Artery Bypass Graft Management of Occlusive Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Mohammed Shamim Rahman; Ruben de Winter; Alex Nap; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.