Literature DB >> 2282729

Interval versus continuous exercise training after coronary bypass surgery: a comparison of training-induced acute reactions with respect to the effectiveness of the exercise methods.

K Meyer1, M Lehmann, G Sünder, J Keul, H Weidemann.   

Abstract

In order to improve endurance by exercise on a bicycle ergometer, both the interval method (I) (exertion and recovery phases alternate each minute) and the continuous method (constant exertion) can be employed. We examined the effects of both methods on the following parameters: heart rate, blood pressure, rate-pressure product, glucose, lactate, and catecholamine levels, and physical performance. Two groups of nine male patients were trained daily on a bicycle ergometer for 3.5 weeks. These patients had undergone coronary bypass surgery 24 and/or 26 days before the training started. The training heart rate was set at 86% of the individual maximum heart rate. In the last week of training, the exercise intensity in both patient groups, following either I or C regimen, was 20:121 W and 83 W respectively. The exercise training lasted 20 minutes with the following findings: (1) there were no significant differences in blood pressure, rate-pressure product, rates of glucose and catecholamines, and (2) there was a significantly higher rate of lactate in the second ten minutes of the I training. Before and after the training period, the patients were subjected to a multistage bicycle ergometer exercise test (sitting). The following results obtained after the training favor the I method: (1) patients' physical performance increased (+0.63 vs. +0.26 W/kg; p less than 0.001); (2) heart rate was lower at rest (-9 vs. -4 beats/min; p less than 0.04) and at 75 W (-12 vs. -2 beats/min; p less than 0.02); (3) rate-pressure product was lower at rest (-1675 vs. -291; p less than 0.04) and at 75 W (-2810 vs. -735; p less than 0.05); (4) rate of lactate was lower at 75 W (-0.83 vs. -0.33 mmol/l; p less than 0.04); (5) catecholamines were not lowered by I or C training, and no differences between the two groups could be observed. Exercise training according to the I method involves both the aerobic and anaerobic capacity of the organism, whereas exercise training according to the C method involves only oxidative capacity. After coronary bypass surgery, the I method is better suited to increase physical performance and is more effective in economizing the cardiac function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2282729     DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960131208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  10 in total

1.  The Effects of High Intensity Interval Training vs Steady State Training on Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity.

Authors:  Carl Foster; Courtney V Farland; Flavia Guidotti; Michelle Harbin; Brianna Roberts; Jeff Schuette; Andrew Tuuri; Scott T Doberstein; John P Porcari
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  High-intensity aerobic interval exercise in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Philippe Meyer; Mathieu Gayda; Martin Juneau; Anil Nigam
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-06

Review 3.  High-intensity interval training in cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Thibaut Guiraud; Anil Nigam; Vincent Gremeaux; Philippe Meyer; Martin Juneau; Laurent Bosquet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Aerobic interval exercise with an eccentric contraction induces muscular hypertrophy and augmentation of muscular strength in rats.

Authors:  Wakako Tsumiyama; Sadaaki Oki; Naomi Takamiya; Namiko Umei; Michele Eisemann Shimizu; Takeya Ono; Akira Otsuka
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-04-30

5.  Commentary: The Effects of High Intensity Interval Training vs Steady State Training on Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity.

Authors:  Victor S Coswig; Paulo Gentil; João P A Naves; Ricardo B Viana; Charles Bartel; Fabrício B Del Vecchio
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Comparison between bicycle ergometric interval and continuous training in patients early after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Marco Reer; Sophie Rauschenberg; Kuno Hottenrott; Rene Schwesig; Viktoria Heinze; Dana Huta; Nadja Schwark; Axel Schlitt
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2021-08-04

7.  Exercise: the brittle cornerstone of type 2 diabetes treatment.

Authors:  S F E Praet; L J C van Loon
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 8.  Exercise therapy in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Stephan F E Praet; Luc J C van Loon
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 9.  Evidence-Based Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Exercise Capacity and Health: A Review with Historical Perspective.

Authors:  Muhammed Mustafa Atakan; Yanchun Li; Şükran Nazan Koşar; Hüseyin Hüsrev Turnagöl; Xu Yan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  High-intensity interval training for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sisi Zhang; Jingxian Zhang; Congying Liang; Xiaochuan Li; Xiaoping Meng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.