Literature DB >> 22827248

Public willingness to pay for recovering and downlisting threatened and endangered marine species.

Kristy Wallmo1, Daniel K Lew.   

Abstract

Nonmarket valuation research has produced economic value estimates for a variety of threatened, endangered, and rare species around the world. Although over 40 value estimates exist, it is often difficult to compare values from different studies due to variations in study design, implementation, and modeling specifications. We conducted a stated-preference choice experiment to estimate the value of recovering or downlisting 8 threatened and endangered marine species in the United States: loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta), leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea), North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis), North Pacific right whale (Eubalaena japonica), upper Willamette River Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Puget Sound Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Hawaiian monk seals (Monachus schauinslandi), and smalltooth sawfish (Pristis pectinata). In May 2009, we surveyed a random sample of U.S. households. We collected data from 8476 households and estimated willingness to pay for recovering and downlisting the 8 species from these data. Respondents were willing to pay for recovering and downlisting threatened and endangered marine taxa. Willingness-to-pay values ranged from $40/household for recovering Puget Sound Chinook salmon to $73/household for recovering the North Pacific right whale. Statistical comparisons among willingness-to-pay values suggest that some taxa are more economically valuable than others, which suggests that the U.S. public's willingness to pay for recovery may vary by species. ©2012 Society for Conservation Biology  No claim to original US government works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22827248     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01899.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  3 in total

1.  River metrics by the public, for the public.

Authors:  Matthew A Weber; Paul L Ringold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Hybrid theories, psychological plausibility, and the human/animal divide.

Authors:  Bob Fischer; Clare Palmer; T J Kasperbauer
Journal:  Philos Stud       Date:  2021-10-18

3.  Compassionate Conservation Clashes With Conservation Biology: Should Empathy, Compassion, and Deontological Moral Principles Drive Conservation Practice?

Authors:  Andrea S Griffin; Alex Callen; Kaya Klop-Toker; Robert J Scanlon; Matt W Hayward
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.