Literature DB >> 22826620

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: complications and inflammatory response.

Jan Martínek1, Ondřej Ryska, Tereza Filípková, Radek Doležel, Stefan Juhas, Jan Motlík, Monika Holubová, Vladimír Nosek, Barbora Rotnáglová, Miroslav Zavoral, Miroslav Ryska.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) vs standard laparoscopic ovariectomy in mini pigs with respect to technical aspects, complications and parameters of systemic inflammatory response.
METHODS: This was a randomized, experimental, survival study. Ten female mini pigs underwent NOTES transgastric ovariectomy (NOTES group) and ten female mini pigs underwent laparoscopic ovariectomy (LAP group). A "percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy" approach with guidewire and sphincterotome was used for gastrotomy creation. The ovary was resected using standard biopsy forceps and a snare. The access site was closed using a "KING" closure with a single endoloop and several clips. In the laparoscopic group, a three-port laparoscopy and an ovariectomy were performed with the use of standard laparoscopic devices. C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood count and interleukin (IL)-6 plasma levels were used as indicators of systemic inflammatory response. All animals were euthanized 28 d after surgery.
RESULTS: All animals survived without complications. The mean procedure time was 41.3 min ± 17.6 min (NOTES group) and 25.7 min ± 5.25 min (LAP group, P < 0.02). Postmortem examinations demonstrated that 50% and 70% of animals were free of any complications in the NOTES and LAP groups, respectively. The remaining animals developed minor complications (adhesions) in a comparable frequency between the two groups. In the NOTES group, one animal developed a small intramural gastric abscess close to the gastrotomy site. A minor serous exudate that was present in 50% and 40% of the animals in the NOTES and laparoscopy groups, respectively, was not considered a complication. In both groups CRP levels increased significantly on the 2nd and 7th postoperative days (POD) and returned to normal after 28 d. On POD 2, an increase of CRP level was significantly higher in the NOTES group compared to the LAP group. Values of IL-6 did not differ from baseline values in either of the groups postoperatively. Interestingly, the platelet count decreased significantly on POD 2, but returned close to baseline values on POD 7 and PODs 28-30.
CONCLUSION: Both NOTES and laparoscopic ovariectomies had a similar frequency of minor complications. However, the NOTES technique produced an increased systemic inflammatory response on POD 2.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery; Ovariectomy; Systemic inflammatory response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22826620      PMCID: PMC3400857          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  22 in total

1.  A novel safe approach to the peritoneal cavity for per-oral transgastric endoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Sergey V Kantsevoy; Sanjay B Jagannath; Hideaki Niiyama; Nina V Isakovich; Sydney S C Chung; Peter B Cotton; Christopher J Gostout; Robert H Hawes; Pankaj J Pasricha; Anthony N Kalloo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Randomized blinded trial shows relative thrombocytopenia in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery compared with standard laparoscopy in a porcine survival model.

Authors:  Juliane Bingener; Joel Michalek; Kent Van Sickle; Wayne Schwesinger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Natural orifice versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a porcine model: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Field F Willingham; Denise W Gee; Patricia Sylla; Avinash Kambadakone; Anand H Singh; Dushyant Sahani; Mari Mino-Kenudson; David W Rattner; William R Brugge
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  A novel double-endoloop technique for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastric access site closure.

Authors:  Tomas Hucl; Marek Benes; Matej Kocik; Martin Krak; Jana Maluskova; Eva Kieslichova; Martin Oliverius; Julius Spicak
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response.

Authors:  F J Vittimberga; D P Foley; W C Meyers; M P Callery
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: progress in humans since white paper.

Authors:  Byron F Santos; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Response of serum cytokines in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J M Cho; A J LaPorta; J R Clark; M J Schofield; S L Hammond; P L Mallory
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Immunologic parameters during NOTES compared with laparoscopy in a randomized blinded porcine trial.

Authors:  Juliane Bingener; Naveen K Krishnegowda; Joel E Michalek
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Oophorectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: feasibility study in dogs.

Authors:  Lynetta J Freeman; Emad Y Rahmani; Stuart Sherman; Michael V Chiorean; Don J Selzer; Peter D Constable; Paul W Snyder
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Systemic inflammatory response after natural orifice translumenal surgery: transvaginal cholecystectomy in a porcine model.

Authors:  Joe K M Fan; Daniel K H Tong; David W Y Ho; John Luk; Wai Lun Law; Simon Law
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparing over-the-scope clip versus endoloop and clips (KING closure) for access site closure: a randomized experimental study.

Authors:  J Martínek; O Ryska; I Tuckova; T Filípková; R Doležel; S Juhas; J Motlík; M Zavoral; M Ryska
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Stress response and well-being after open, laparoscopic, and NOTES transgastric uterine horn resection in a randomized porcine model.

Authors:  Maria Bergström; Asghar Azadani; Peter Falk; Per-Ola Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Establishment of the hybrid endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Hirohito Mori; Hideki Kobara; Shintaro Fujihara; Noriko Nishiyama; Maki Ayagi; Tae Matsunaga; Tatsuo Yachida; Tsutomu Masaki
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-09

4.  Comparison of Inflammatory Response to Transgastric and Transcolonic NOTES.

Authors:  Tomas Hucl; Marek Benes; Matej Kocik; Alla Splichalova; Jana Maluskova; Martin Krak; Vera Lanska; Marie Heczkova; Eva Kieslichova; Martin Oliverius; Julius Spicak
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.260

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.