Literature DB >> 22826540

GeneTalk: an expert exchange platform for assessing rare sequence variants in personal genomes.

Tom Kamphans1, Peter M Krawitz.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Next-generation sequencing has become a powerful tool in personalized medicine. Exomes or even whole genomes of patients suffering from rare diseases are screened for sequence variants. After filtering out common polymorphisms, the assessment and interpretation of detected personal variants in the clinical context is an often time-consuming effort. We have developed GeneTalk, a web-based platform that serves as an expert exchange network for the assessment of personal and potentially disease-relevant sequence variants. GeneTalk assists a clinical geneticist who is searching for information about specific sequence variants and connects this user to other users with expertise for the same sequence variant. AVAILABILITY: GeneTalk is available at www.gene-talk.de. Users can login without registering in a demo account. CONTACT: peter.krawitz@gene-talk.de.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22826540      PMCID: PMC3463119          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


1 INTRODUCTION

Exome sequencing has become an invaluably powerful tool in the identification of disease causing variants (Bamshad ; Robinson ) and the first patients are now already treated based on sequence variant information of their exomes (Worthey ). To date, the primary bottleneck in such clinical personal genome cases is not anymore data generation but data analysis. Clinical geneticists therefore require efficient tools for filtering and interpreting the clinically meaningful sequence variants. Currently, the most potent filters for reducing the set of novel and potentially causal mutations in rare diseases are based on variation data from population scale sequencing efforts such as the 1000 genomes project (www.1000genomes.org). Only very few variants will be medically relevant, perhaps—in case of a monogenic disorder—just one. Bioinformatics tools such as ANNOVAR (Wang ) and MutationTaster (Schwarz ) may then be used for comprehensive annotations and predictions about the expected pathogenicity of a variant. However, such classifiers have high false-positive and -negative error rates. They may therefore serve only for prioritization but cannot replace the assessment of human experts.

APPROACH

In a genetic disease of unknown cause, the association with a new disease gene may be shown either by a functional assessment of the detected variants or by statistical evidence. For a functional assessment, expert knowledge about a suitable test essay or genetically modified model organisms is required. For statistical evidence, a sufficient number of patients of the same disease group with mutations in the same gene are required. However, usually a clinical geneticist analyzing a patient’s exome does not have access to many similar cases because the disease is so rare. Furthermore, she may not be skilled to do the functional assessment immediately and happened to identify a new gene of interest after filtering the patient’s variants. Hence, such a geneticist is interested in finding other individuals with mutations in the same gene or scientists that are performing basic research on this gene. Web-based expert networks proved to be efficient tools for knowledge management in various scientific fields. There are knowledge bases for disease, gene and protein-centered information (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim, www.geneontology.org, www.wikiproteins.org). However, there is no platform that allows the scientific exchange of experts about specific variants detected in next-generation sequencing (NGS) experiments. GeneTalk aims at providing such a web-based platform that enables to improve expert annotations on human genetic variants in a community approach.

APPLICATION

GeneTalk is an exchange platform that allows users to look for variant-specific information and makes human expertise searchable (Fig. 1). Any sequence variant with respect to the human reference genome, based on the GRCh37 assembly, is annotatable. The user decides to whom an annotation is visible. One user may link to scientific articles that are relevant in context with a certain variant or that even provide evidence that a mutation is disease causing. A second user might comment on this annotation to express her concern because she views the detected variant as an technical artefact. A third user might state that she has seen patients with this genotype and is not sure about the statistical significance of the association with the phenotype. All annotations and comments of GeneTalk users about a certain genomic position can be read like a locus-specific conversation thread. The trustworthiness of annotations can be rated by users as well as the likelihood of a mutation to be disease causing (Fig. 1). If there is consensus in the GeneTalk community that a certain mutation is pathogenic and its annotation is trustworthy, this mutation is added to the annotation track ‘pathogenic’. This annotation track is thus curated in a collaborative effort of all GeneTalk users.
Fig. 1

GeneTalk, a communication platform for sequence variants. A user filters sequence variants down to a small set of potentially disease relevant mutations. She then searches for detailed information annotated by the GeneTalk community for these variants. In GeneTalk, users may annotate and comment genetic variants. Annotations and comments may link to the relevant literature or discuss experimental and clinical findings. Based on this locus-specific information, GeneTalk users may rate the trustworthiness of an annotation and the potential of a mutation to be disease causing. This screenshot is taken from fritz’ account who is looking at the annotation of a mutation in the gene PIGV. The GeneTalk community finds this annotation trustworthy and rates the described mutation as highly likely to cause a syndrome called hyperphosphatasia with mental retardation. The user petkraw left a comment for this variant. He seems to have some expertise in this disease and might be an interesting person to contact for fritz

GeneTalk, a communication platform for sequence variants. A user filters sequence variants down to a small set of potentially disease relevant mutations. She then searches for detailed information annotated by the GeneTalk community for these variants. In GeneTalk, users may annotate and comment genetic variants. Annotations and comments may link to the relevant literature or discuss experimental and clinical findings. Based on this locus-specific information, GeneTalk users may rate the trustworthiness of an annotation and the potential of a mutation to be disease causing. This screenshot is taken from fritz’ account who is looking at the annotation of a mutation in the gene PIGV. The GeneTalk community finds this annotation trustworthy and rates the described mutation as highly likely to cause a syndrome called hyperphosphatasia with mental retardation. The user petkraw left a comment for this variant. He seems to have some expertise in this disease and might be an interesting person to contact for fritz GeneTalk also assists users in filtering genetic variants from NGS projects. A user that has a patient’s informed consent to analyze the clinical data may upload sequence variants to GeneTalk in variant call format (VCF) (Danecek ), version 4.0 and above. In order to reduce the initial VCF to a set of potentially disease relevant mutations, the user can apply certain filter settings first: the list of variants could be restricted to, e.g. only nonsynonymous, homozygous variants with the functional and inheritance filter. Common variants can be filtered out by a genotype frequency filter that is based on high-quality NGS data sets from HapMap, the 1000 genomes project and the 5000 exomes project. If a linkage analysis has been performed, a genomic interval may be set to limit the search space or gene panels may be applied as in silico filters to restrict the analysis to certain molecular pathways. In a rare recessive monogenic disease, the mode of inheritance and the genotype frequency filter that is set to 1/1000 usually reduce the number of candidate mutations down to a few hundreds in a patient’s exome. These variants may then be further analyzed for ‘disease-causing’ annotations. If the pathogenic mutation of this case has not yet been described in the literature and no ‘pathogenic’ annotation exists, the user can look for annotations that discuss patients with similar phenotypes or basic research scientists that talk about unpublished experimental data for this gene. Such an annotation can serve as a conversation starter and the users can simply contact the author by clicking on the envelope symbol (Fig. 1). Currently, the annotation database contains over 32 000 clinically relevant entries from dBSNP. A video tutorial on www.gene-talk.de illustrates how an exome dataset may be analyzed in GeneTalk: In a few easy steps, the variant data of a simulated patient with hyperphosphatasia with mental retardation syndrome are filtered down to the disease-causing mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

GeneTalk provides an intuitive web-based interface for geneticists that analyze human sequence variants. GeneTalk is a platform for efficient knowledge management of genetic variants and simplifies the scientific discussion and interpretation especially of rare mutations.
  7 in total

1.  MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations.

Authors:  Jana Marie Schwarz; Christian Rödelsperger; Markus Schuelke; Dominik Seelow
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Strategies for exome and genome sequence data analysis in disease-gene discovery projects.

Authors:  Peter N Robinson; P Krawitz; S Mundlos
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 3.  Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discovery.

Authors:  Michael J Bamshad; Sarah B Ng; Abigail W Bigham; Holly K Tabor; Mary J Emond; Deborah A Nickerson; Jay Shendure
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  LOVD v.2.0: the next generation in gene variant databases.

Authors:  Ivo F A C Fokkema; Peter E M Taschner; Gerard C P Schaafsma; J Celli; Jeroen F J Laros; Johan T den Dunnen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Mingyao Li; Hakon Hakonarson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Making a definitive diagnosis: successful clinical application of whole exome sequencing in a child with intractable inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Worthey; Alan N Mayer; Grant D Syverson; Daniel Helbling; Benedetta B Bonacci; Brennan Decker; Jaime M Serpe; Trivikram Dasu; Michael R Tschannen; Regan L Veith; Monica J Basehore; Ulrich Broeckel; Aoy Tomita-Mitchell; Marjorie J Arca; James T Casper; David A Margolis; David P Bick; Martin J Hessner; John M Routes; James W Verbsky; Howard J Jacob; David P Dimmock
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  The variant call format and VCFtools.

Authors:  Petr Danecek; Adam Auton; Goncalo Abecasis; Cornelis A Albers; Eric Banks; Mark A DePristo; Robert E Handsaker; Gerton Lunter; Gabor T Marth; Stephen T Sherry; Gilean McVean; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 6.937

  7 in total
  21 in total

1.  Against all odds: blended phenotypes of three single-gene defects.

Authors:  Yong Li; Anika Salfelder; Karl Otfried Schwab; Sarah Catharina Grünert; Tanja Velten; Dieter Lütjohann; Pablo Villavicencio-Lorini; Uta Matysiak-Scholze; Bernhard Zabel; Anna Köttgen; Ekkehart Lausch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Molecular genetic analysis of consanguineous families with primary microcephaly identified pathogenic variants in the ASPM gene.

Authors:  Muzammil Ahmad Khan; Christian Windpassinger; Muhammad Zeeshan Ali; Muhammad Zubair; Hadia Gul; Safdar Abbas; Saadullah Khan; Muhammad Badar; Ramzi M Mohammad; Zafar Nawaz
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Mutational analysis uncovers monogenic bone disorders in women with pregnancy-associated osteoporosis: three novel mutations in LRP5, COL1A1, and COL1A2.

Authors:  S Butscheidt; A Delsmann; T Rolvien; F Barvencik; M Al-Bughaili; S Mundlos; T Schinke; M Amling; U Kornak; R Oheim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Mutations in PGAP3 impair GPI-anchor maturation, causing a subtype of hyperphosphatasia with mental retardation.

Authors:  Malcolm F Howard; Yoshiko Murakami; Alistair T Pagnamenta; Cornelia Daumer-Haas; Björn Fischer; Jochen Hecht; David A Keays; Samantha J L Knight; Uwe Kölsch; Ulrike Krüger; Steffen Leiz; Yusuke Maeda; Daphne Mitchell; Stefan Mundlos; John A Phillips; Peter N Robinson; Usha Kini; Jenny C Taylor; Denise Horn; Taroh Kinoshita; Peter M Krawitz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Homozygous and compound-heterozygous mutations in TGDS cause Catel-Manzke syndrome.

Authors:  Nadja Ehmke; Almuth Caliebe; Rainer Koenig; Sarina G Kant; Zornitza Stark; Valérie Cormier-Daire; Dagmar Wieczorek; Gabriele Gillessen-Kaesbach; Kirstin Hoff; Amit Kawalia; Holger Thiele; Janine Altmüller; Björn Fischer-Zirnsak; Alexej Knaus; Na Zhu; Verena Heinrich; Celine Huber; Izabela Harabula; Malte Spielmann; Denise Horn; Uwe Kornak; Jochen Hecht; Peter M Krawitz; Peter Nürnberg; Reiner Siebert; Hermann Manzke; Stefan Mundlos
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Mutations in WNT1 cause different forms of bone fragility.

Authors:  Katharina Keupp; Filippo Beleggia; Hülya Kayserili; Aileen M Barnes; Magdalena Steiner; Oliver Semler; Björn Fischer; Gökhan Yigit; Claudia Y Janda; Jutta Becker; Stefan Breer; Umut Altunoglu; Johannes Grünhagen; Peter Krawitz; Jochen Hecht; Thorsten Schinke; Elena Makareeva; Ekkehart Lausch; Tufan Cankaya; José A Caparrós-Martín; Pablo Lapunzina; Samia Temtamy; Mona Aglan; Bernhard Zabel; Peer Eysel; Friederike Koerber; Sergey Leikin; K Christopher Garcia; Christian Netzer; Eckhard Schönau; Victor L Ruiz-Perez; Stefan Mundlos; Michael Amling; Uwe Kornak; Joan Marini; Bernd Wollnik
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Microcephaly, short stature, and limb abnormality disorder due to novel autosomal biallelic DONSON mutations in two German siblings.

Authors:  Solveig Schulz; Martin A Mensah; Heike de Vries; Rosemarie Fröber; Bernd Romeike; Uwe Schneider; Stephan Borte; Detlev Schindler; Karim Kentouche
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Missense variant in CCDC22 causes X-linked recessive intellectual disability with features of Ritscher-Schinzel/3C syndrome.

Authors:  Mateusz Kolanczyk; Peter Krawitz; Jochen Hecht; Anna Hupalowska; Marta Miaczynska; Katrin Marschner; Claire Schlack; Denise Emmerich; Karolina Kobus; Uwe Kornak; Peter N Robinson; Barbara Plecko; Gernot Grangl; Sabine Uhrig; Stefan Mundlos; Denise Horn
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  PGAP2 mutations, affecting the GPI-anchor-synthesis pathway, cause hyperphosphatasia with mental retardation syndrome.

Authors:  Peter M Krawitz; Yoshiko Murakami; Angelika Rieß; Marja Hietala; Ulrike Krüger; Na Zhu; Taroh Kinoshita; Stefan Mundlos; Jochen Hecht; Peter N Robinson; Denise Horn
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  De Novo Mutations in SLC25A24 Cause a Craniosynostosis Syndrome with Hypertrichosis, Progeroid Appearance, and Mitochondrial Dysfunction.

Authors:  Nadja Ehmke; Luitgard Graul-Neumann; Lukasz Smorag; Rainer Koenig; Lara Segebrecht; Pilar Magoulas; Fernando Scaglia; Esra Kilic; Anna F Hennig; Nicolai Adolphs; Namrata Saha; Beatrix Fauler; Vera M Kalscheuer; Friederike Hennig; Janine Altmüller; Christian Netzer; Holger Thiele; Peter Nürnberg; Gökhan Yigit; Marten Jäger; Jochen Hecht; Ulrike Krüger; Thorsten Mielke; Peter M Krawitz; Denise Horn; Markus Schuelke; Stefan Mundlos; Carlos A Bacino; Penelope E Bonnen; Bernd Wollnik; Björn Fischer-Zirnsak; Uwe Kornak
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.