Literature DB >> 22826411

Follow-up of radiologically totally implanted central venous access ports of the upper arm: long-term complications in 127,750 catheter-days.

Jasmin D Busch1, Jochen Herrmann, Friederike Heller, Thorsten Derlin, Andreas Koops, Gerhard Adam, Christian R Habermann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to retrospectively evaluate radiologically totally implanted central venous access ports (VAPs) of the upper arm in terms of safety, technical feasibility, and device-related complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred seven consecutive patients (mean [± SD] age, 59.2 ± 11.4 years) who received a totally implanted central VAP between January 2005 and July 2010 were included. The insertion procedure was performed in an interventional radiology suite using the Seldinger technique. Neither antibiotic prophylaxis nor long-term anticoagulation was administered.
RESULTS: In 507 patients, a total of 523 devices were implanted. Of these 523 procedures, 512 complete datasets were available during follow-up. The primary technical success rate was 99.04%. All procedures were completed without major complications. During follow-up and with a total number of 127,750 days of totally implanted central VAP implantation (248 ± 279 days/patient; range, 1-1687 days/patient), 50 devices had to be revised because of complications (9.8%). Complications occurred at a mean of 114 ± 183 days (range, 1-1113 days) after placement. Early complications were noted in 21 of 512 cases (4.1%), and late complications were noted in 29 of 512 cases (5.7%). Complications were as follows: local infections, 4.9% (25/512); systemic infections, 0.4% (2/512); venous thrombosis, 1.6% (8/512); paralysis of the median nerve, 0.6% (3/512); skin dehiscence at the port site, 0.2% (1/512); and mechanical problems including catheter line displacement, port hub rotation, and catheter fracture, 2.1% (11/512).
CONCLUSION: Radiologic placement of a totally implanted central VAP is a safe procedure with a low rate of both early and late device-related complications. The method is effective for delivery of chemotherapy, parenteral nutrition, and frequent IV medication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22826411     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  Current situation regarding central venous port implantation procedures and complications: a questionnaire-based survey of 11,693 implantations in Japan.

Authors:  Masatoshi Shiono; Shin Takahashi; Masanobu Takahashi; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Chikashi Ishioka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Short-term and long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of central venous access port devices implanted at the forearm: a retrospective monocenter analysis in 1704 patients.

Authors:  Moritz Wildgruber; Sebastian Borgmeyer; Bernhard Haller; Heike Jansen; Jochen Gaa; Marion Kiechle; Reinhard Meier; Johannes Ettl; Hermann Berger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Kinesiophobia and related factors in cancer patients with TIAPs during the long term: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Wang; Xiao-Xia Qiu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Complications and Management of Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Ports in Cancer Patients at a University Hospital in Oman.

Authors:  Philomena C D'Souza; Shiyam Kumar; Annupam Kakaria; Rashid Al-Sukaiti; Khalid Al-Baimani; Rana S Hamid; Alok K Mittal; Muna Al-Balushi; Ikram A Burney; Mansour S Al-Moundhri
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2021-03-15

Review 5.  Venous Access Devices: Clinical Rounds.

Authors:  Laurl Matey; Dawn Camp-Sorrell
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

6.  Upper-Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Breast Cancer With Chest Versus Arm Central Venous Port Catheters.

Authors:  Danielle Tippit; Eric Siegel; Daniella Ochoa; Angela Pennisi; Erica Hill; Amelia Merrill; Mark Rowe; Ronda Henry-Tillman; Aneesha Ananthula; Issam Makhoul
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2018-04-20

7.  The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation.

Authors:  Wen-Cheng Wei; Ching-Yang Wu; Ching-Feng Wu; Jui-Ying Fu; Ta-Wei Su; Sheng-Yueh Yu; Tsung-Chi Kao; Po-Jen Ko
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.