Literature DB >> 22826035

Rationalizing structure and target relationships between current drugs.

Ye Hu1, Jürgen Bajorath.   

Abstract

A recent analysis of structure and target relationships between current drugs and bioactive compounds has revealed that only a small fraction of drugs that are active against the same or overlapping targets are involved in substructure relationships and/or share the same topology. By contrast, structurally related drugs displayed a tendency to preferentially act against different targets. For bioactive compounds, opposite trends were observed. These surprising findings arising from the global analysis have now been examined in detail by analyzing structure and target relationships between drugs at the level of individual targets and individual drugs and by comparing the results of local (target- or drug-based) and global relationship analysis. On the basis of target-based analysis, on average, only 14% of drugs active against a given target form well-defined structural relationships. In addition, drug-based analysis revealed that on average 72% of all structurally related drugs have no or at most 20% target overlap. Taken together, the results of our current analysis at the level of single targets and drugs rationalize their unexpected structure and target relationships in a consistent manner. These findings also have implications for ligand binding characteristics of popular drug targets and for frequently observed polypharmacological drug behavior.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22826035      PMCID: PMC3475854          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-012-9392-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  13 in total

1.  Using molecular equivalence numbers to visually explore structural features that distinguish chemical libraries.

Authors:  Yong-Jin Xu; Mark Johnson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  Medicinal chemistry of target family-directed masterkeys.

Authors:  Gerhard Müller
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Polypharmacology directed compound data mining: identification of promiscuous chemotypes with different activity profiles and comparison to approved drugs.

Authors:  Ye Hu; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs.

Authors:  G Richard Bickerton; Gaia V Paolini; Jérémy Besnard; Sorel Muresan; Andrew L Hopkins
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 24.427

5.  On outliers and activity cliffs--why QSAR often disappoints.

Authors:  Gerald M Maggiora
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Systematic analysis of public domain compound potency data identifies selective molecular scaffolds across druggable target families.

Authors:  Ye Hu; Anne Mai Wassermann; Eugen Lounkine; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Lessons learned from molecular scaffold analysis.

Authors:  Ye Hu; Dagmar Stumpfe; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 8.  The chemical basis of pharmacology.

Authors:  Michael J Keiser; John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  DrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugs.

Authors:  Craig Knox; Vivian Law; Timothy Jewison; Philip Liu; Son Ly; Alex Frolkis; Allison Pon; Kelly Banco; Christine Mak; Vanessa Neveu; Yannick Djoumbou; Roman Eisner; An Chi Guo; David S Wishart
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery.

Authors:  Anna Gaulton; Louisa J Bellis; A Patricia Bento; Jon Chambers; Mark Davies; Anne Hersey; Yvonne Light; Shaun McGlinchey; David Michalovich; Bissan Al-Lazikani; John P Overington
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  Structural and Activity Profile Relationships Between Drug Scaffolds.

Authors:  Ye Hu; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  CFam: a chemical families database based on iterative selection of functional seeds and seed-directed compound clustering.

Authors:  Cheng Zhang; Lin Tao; Chu Qin; Peng Zhang; Shangying Chen; Xian Zeng; Feng Xu; Zhe Chen; Sheng Yong Yang; Yu Zong Chen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 16.971

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.