Literature DB >> 22825836

A 10-year follow-up study on long-term clinical outcomes of lumbar microendoscopic discectomy.

M Wang1, Y Zhou, J Wang, Z Zhang, C Li.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to determine the 10-year clinical outcomes of microendoscopic discectomy (MED), a surgical procedure for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
METHODS: A total of 151 patients with LDH were treated with MED and followed postoperatively for up to 10 years. The modified MacNab criteria were used to examine the clinical outcomes. In a subset of patients (n = 107), the disc-height ratio was measured radiographically according to the Mochida's method.
RESULTS: Based on the modified MacNab criteria, 120 (79%) patients were rated as excellent, 20 (12.9%) as good, 7 (4.6%) as fair, and 5 (3.5%) as poor. Only 5 patients (3.5%) required additional surgery due to a recurrence of herniation. Other complications included intraoperative dural lacerations (5 patients) and spondylodiscitis (3 patients). Mochida's method showed an average disc-height ratio of 76.25%. Approximately 67% of the patients were able to maintain their primary occupations.
CONCLUSION: The 10-year follow-up study showed that the long-term clinical outcomes of MED are satisfactory and better than those of the traditional discectomy procedure. The MED procedure is both feasible and efficacious for the treatment of LDH. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22825836     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1297248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg        ISSN: 2193-6315            Impact factor:   1.268


  8 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive spine surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Péter Banczerowski; Gábor Czigléczki; Zoltán Papp; Róbert Veres; Harry Zvi Rappaport; János Vajda
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Incidence of Low Back Pain After Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Disc and Its Effect on Patient-reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Stephen K Mendenhall; Saniya S Godil; Priya Sivasubramanian; Kevin Cahill; John Ziewacz; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  What were the advantages of microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation comparing with open discectomy: a meta-analysis?

Authors:  Xiaoping Mu; Jianxun Wei; Peifeng Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

Review 4.  Lumbar Endoscopic Microdiscectomy: Where Are We Now? An Updated Literature Review Focused on Clinical Outcome, Complications, and Rate of Recurrence.

Authors:  Giulio Anichini; Alessandro Landi; Federico Caporlingua; André Beer-Furlan; Christian Brogna; Roberto Delfini; Emiliano Passacantilli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The surgical treatment of single level multi-focal subarticular and paracentral and/or far-lateral lumbar disc herniations: the single incision full endoscopic approach.

Authors:  James J Yue; David L Scott; Xiao Han; Alem Yacob
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

6.  Repeated microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation.

Authors:  Tianyong Hou; Qiang Zhou; Fei Dai; Fei Luo; Qingyi He; Jinsong Zhang; Jianzhong Xu
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Analysis of Revision Surgery of Microsurgical Lumbar Discectomy.

Authors:  Taku Inada; Sei Nishida; Taigo Kawaoka; Toshiyuki Takahashi; Junya Hanakita
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-02-07

8.  Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Zhaojun Song; Maobo Ran; Juan Luo; Kai Zhang; Yongjie Ye; Jiazhuang Zheng; Zhi Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.