Literature DB >> 22825577

Management of poor postictal suppression during electroconvulsive therapy with propofol anesthesia: a report of two cases.

Jonathan T Stewart1.   

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that a greater degree of postictal suppression (the abruptness and magnitude of the EEG voltage drop at the end of the seizure) may be associated with better clinical response to electroconvulsive therapy. Retrospective studies have shown better postictal suppression when propofol is used for induction rather than the more commonly used methohexital. We report two patients in whom poor postictal suppression was rectified by switching from methohexital to propofol. The clinical significance of this improvement in postictal suppression is unclear, and prospective studies will be needed to clarify any clinical benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22825577     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-012-1455-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  12 in total

Review 1.  Stimulus titration and ECT dosing.

Authors:  Richard Abrams
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.635

2.  Is postictal electrical silence a predictor of response to electroconvulsive therapy?

Authors:  T Suppes; A Webb; T Carmody; E Gordon; R Gutierrez-Esteinou; J I Hudson; H G Pope
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  1996-11-04       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  ECT-induced amnesia and postictal EEG suppression.

Authors:  W F Daniel; H F Crovitz; R D Weiner; H S Swartzwelder; E M Kahn
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Propofol [correction of propfol] versus methohexital for electroconvulsive therapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  B Walder; M Seeck; M R Tramèr
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.956

5.  Ictal physiological characteristics of remitters during bilateral electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  Hideki Azuma; Atsurou Yamada; Yoshihiro Shinagawa; Yumi Nakano; Norio Watanabe; Tatsuo Akechi; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  A comparison of propofol and methohexital as anesthetic agents for ECT: effects on seizure duration, therapeutic outcome, and memory.

Authors:  B Mårtensson; A Bartfai; B Hallén; C Hellström; T Junthé; M Olander
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Propofol and methohexital as anesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized, double-blind comparison of electroconvulsive therapy seizure quality, therapeutic efficacy, and cognitive performance.

Authors:  Christian Geretsegger; Marius Nickel; Berthold Judendorfer; Erika Rochowanski; Erich Novak; Wolfgang Aichhorn
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.635

8.  Efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy after propofol and methohexital anesthesia.

Authors:  E Malsch; I Gratz; S Mani; C Backup; S Levy; E Allen
Journal:  Convuls Ther       Date:  1994-09

9.  The influence of anaesthetic medication on safety, tolerability and clinical effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  Daniela Eser; Caroline Nothdurfter; Cornelius Schüle; Julia Damm; Yvonne Steng; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Rainer Rupprecht; Thomas Baghai
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Propofol and methohexital as anesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): a comparison of seizure-quality measures and vital signs.

Authors:  C Geretsegger; E Rochowanski; C Kartnig; A F Unterrainer
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.635

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Psychiatric Patient as a Health Resource Consumer: Costs Associated with Electroconvulsive Therapy.

Authors:  Carmen Selva-Sevilla; Maria Luisa Gonzalez-Moral; Maria Teresa Tolosa-Perez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.