| Literature DB >> 22825315 |
Eliana Marisa Ramos1, Jeanne C Latourelle, Ji-Hyun Lee, Tammy Gillis, Jayalakshmi S Mysore, Ferdinando Squitieri, Alba Di Pardo, Stefano Di Donato, Michael R Hayden, Patrick J Morrison, Martha Nance, Christopher A Ross, Russell L Margolis, Estrella Gomez-Tortosa, Carmen Ayuso, Oksana Suchowersky, Ronald J Trent, Elizabeth McCusker, Andrea Novelletto, Marina Frontali, Randi Jones, Tetsuo Ashizawa, Samuel Frank, Marie-Helene Saint-Hilaire, Steven M Hersch, Herminia D Rosas, Diane Lucente, Madaline B Harrison, Andrea Zanko, Karen Marder, James F Gusella, Jong-Min Lee, Isabel Alonso, Jorge Sequeiros, Richard H Myers, Marcy E Macdonald.
Abstract
Huntington's disease (HD) is an inherited neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor, cognitive and behavioral disturbances, caused by the expansion of a CAG trinucleotide repeat in the HD gene. The CAG allele size is the major determinant of age at onset (AO) of motor symptoms, although the remaining variance in AO is highly heritable. The rs7665116 SNP in PPARGC1A, encoding the mitochondrial regulator PGC-1α, has been reported to be a significant modifier of AO in three European HD cohorts, perhaps due to affected cases from Italy. We attempted to replicate these findings in a large collection of (1,727) HD patient DNA samples of European origin. In the entire cohort, rs7665116 showed a significant effect in the dominant model (p value = 0.008) and the additive model (p value = 0.009). However, when examined by origin, cases of Southern European origin had an increased rs7665116 minor allele frequency (MAF), consistent with this being an ancestry-tagging SNP. The Southern European cases, despite similar mean CAG allele size, had a significantly older mean AO (p < 0.001), suggesting population-dependent phenotype stratification. When the generalized estimating equations models were adjusted for ancestry, the effect of the rs7665116 genotype on AO decreased dramatically. Our results do not support rs7665116 as a modifier of AO of motor symptoms, as we found evidence for a dramatic effect of phenotypic (AO) and genotypic (MAF) stratification among European cohorts that was not considered in previously reported association studies. A significantly older AO in Southern Europe may reflect population differences in genetic or environmental factors that warrant further investigation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22825315 PMCID: PMC3492689 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-012-1205-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Genet ISSN: 0340-6717 Impact factor: 4.132
Genetic and clinical data among European cases of Western and Southern origin
| Origin of samples | 36-87 HD CAG range | 40-53 HD CAG range | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of samples | Mean HD CAG (median) | Mean Motor Onset (median) | rs7665116 MAF | Number of samples | Mean HD CAG (median) | Mean Motor Onset (median) | rs7665116 MAF | |
| Southern Europeana | 934 | 44.29 (43) | 47.34 (48) | 0.169 | 879 | 43.73 (43) | 48.04 (48) | 0.173 |
| Western Europeanb | 793 | 44.78 (44) | 43.20 (43) | 0.119 | 749 | 44.32 (44) | 43.83 (43) | 0.118 |
| Total European | 1,727 | 44.52 (43) | 45.44 (45) | 0.146 | 1,628 | 44.00 (43) | 46.10 (46) | 0.148 |
Self-reported
Genetic background confirmed
Fig. 1Variance of age at motor onset for HD cases of Western and Southern European origin. A box plot depicting the relationship of the natural log-transformed age at onset of motor symptoms to the expanded CAG allele size, for patients in the 40–53 CAG range, illustrating that self-reported Southern Europeans had an older age at onset across the spectrum of allele sizes. Circles are outliers defined by a standard quartile method (outside of 1.5 times interquartile range), some of which could reflect errors in the motor AO data while others may represent true biological outliers
Multivariate correlation of rs7665116 with residual age at motor onset
| Model | Standardized coefficient | Standard error | 95 % confidence limits |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| PGC1α rs7665116 | |||||
| T–T vs. T–C vs. C–C |
| 0.0348 | 0.022 | 0.158 |
|
| PGC1α rs7665116 + ancestry | |||||
| T–T vs. T–C vs. C–C |
| 0.0345 | 0.001 | 0.136 |
|
| WE vs. SE | 0.208 | 0.0416 | 0.127 | 0.290 | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| PGC1α rs7665116 | |||||
| T–T vs. T–C + C–C |
| 0.0424 | 0.029 | 0.196 |
|
| PGC1α rs7665116 + ancestry | |||||
| T–T vs. T–C + C–C |
| 0.0418 | 0.007 | 0.171 |
|
| WE vs. SE | 0.208 | 0.0415 | 0.127 | 0.289 | <0.001 |
* p values were derived using GEE to account for familial relationships