Literature DB >> 22824932

Parental decision-making preferences in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Vanessa N Madrigal1, Karen W Carroll, Kari R Hexem, Jennifer A Faerber, Wynne E Morrison, Chris Feudtner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess parental decision-making preferences in the high-stress environment of the pediatric intensive care unit and test whether preferences vary with demographics, complex chronic conditions, prior admissions to the pediatric intensive care unit, and parental positive and negative emotional affect.
DESIGN: Institutional Review Board-approved prospective cohort study conducted between December 2009 and April 2010.
SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-seven English-speaking parents of 75 children either <18 yrs of age or cognitively incapable of making their own decisions and who were hospitalized in the pediatric intensive care unit for >72 hrs.
INTERVENTIONS: Parents were interviewed in person and completed standardized instruments that assessed decision-making preferences and parental affect.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The majority of parents in the analytic sample preferred shared decision making with their doctors (40.0%) or making the final decision/mostly making the final decision on their own (41.0%). None of the child and parent characteristics in the analytic sample were found to be significantly associated with the top decision-making preference. Using shared decision making as a reference category, we determined whether positive or negative affect scores were associated with preferring other decision-making options. We found that parents with higher positive affect were less likely to prefer self/mostly self (autonomous decision making). Increased positive affect was also associated with a reduced likelihood of preferring doctor/mostly doctor (delegating the decision), but not to a significant degree.
CONCLUSIONS: Most parents in the pediatric intensive care unit prefer their role in decision making to be shared with their doctor or to have significant autonomy in the final decision. A sizeable minority, however, prefer decision-making delegation. Parental emotional affect has an association with decision-making preference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22824932     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825b9151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  17 in total

1.  Parent Preferences for Shared Decision-making in Acute Versus Chronic Illness.

Authors:  Dina M Tom; Christian Aquino; Anthony R Arredondo; Byron A Foster
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2017-10

2.  The luck of the draw: physician-related variability in end-of-life decision-making in intensive care.

Authors:  Dominic J C Wilkinson; Robert D Truog
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Communication With Limited English-Proficient Families in the PICU.

Authors:  Adrian D Zurca; Kiondra R Fisher; Remigio J Flor; Catalina D Gonzalez-Marques; Jichuan Wang; Yao I Cheng; Tessie W October
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2016-12-15

4.  Shared Decision-Making in Intensive Care Units. Executive Summary of the American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.

Authors:  Alexander A Kon; Judy E Davidson; Wynne Morrison; Marion Danis; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Acceptability of Family-Centered Advanced Care Planning for Adolescents With HIV.

Authors:  Ronald H Dallas; Allison Kimmel; Megan L Wilkins; Sohail Rana; Ana Garcia; Yao I Cheng; Jichuan Wang; Maureen E Lyon
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The importance of shared decision-making in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Frank Soltys; Sydney E Philpott-Streiff; Lindsay Fuzzell; Mary C Politi
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Aligning critical care interventions with patient goals: A modified Delphi study.

Authors:  Alison E Turnbull; Sarina K Sahetya; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.210

8.  How healthcare provider talk with parents of children following severe traumatic brain injury is perceived in early acute care.

Authors:  Cecelia I Roscigno; Teresa A Savage; Gerald Grant; Gerry Philipsen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  The parent perspective: "being a good parent" when making critical decisions in the PICU.

Authors:  Tessie W October; Kiondra R Fisher; Chris Feudtner; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.624

10.  Parental Conflict, Regret, and Short-term Impact on Quality of Life in Tracheostomy Decision-Making.

Authors:  Tessie W October; Amy H Jones; Hannah Greenlick Michals; Lauren M Hebert; Jiji Jiang; Jichuan Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.