Literature DB >> 22824588

Urologic complication in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: meta-analysis of 20 studies.

Jong Ha Hwang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis was done to assess the risk of intraoperative and postoperative urologic complications, and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and lymph node dissection.
METHODS: Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane library were searched for studies published to December, 2011, supplemented by manual searches of relevant bibliographies from the retrieved articles. Two researchers independently extracted the data. Eligible studies had reported perioperative complications and a sample size of at least 10 patients.
RESULTS: The search yielded 19 retrospective studies and one prospective cohort study (intraoperative urologic complication, 18 studies; postoperative urologic complication, 16 studies). When all studies were pooled, the odds ratio (OR) of LRH for the risk of intraoperative urologic complications compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) was 1.97 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-3.13] and the OR of LRH for postoperative complication risk compared to ARH was 1.35 [95% CI 0.84-2.16]. In subgroup analysis, obesity and laparoscopic type (laparoscopic assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy) were associated with intraoperative urologic complications.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy is associated with a significant increased risk of intraoperative urologic complications.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22824588     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Bo Wook Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  The incidence of postoperative symptomatic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy between abdominal and laparoscopic approach: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Bo Wook Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 3.  Assessment of morbidity in gynaecologic oncology laparoscopy and identification of possible risk factors.

Authors:  Maite Peña-Fernández; Inés Solar-Vilariño; María Xosé Rodríguez-Álvarez; Ignacio Zapardiel; Francisco Estévez; Pilar Gayoso-Diz
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2015-12-14

4.  Safety and Cost Considerations during the Introduction Period of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.

Authors:  A Anagnostopoulos; S Mitra; B Decruze; R Macdonald; J Kirwan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2017-01-10

5.  The incidence of urologic complications requiring urologic procedure in radical hysterectomy and difference between abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Hyeongsu Kim; Ho Jin Jeong; Bo Wook Kim; Jong Ha Hwang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Does completion of radical hysterectomy improve oncological outcomes of women with clinical early-stage cervical cancer and intraoperative detection of nodal involvement?: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cui Hu; Yu Xu; Qianwen Zhang; Qing Liu; Yi Du; Ya Jia; Yue-Dong He; Ai Zheng; Hui Xu; Shuang-Shuang Cui; Yong Tian; Lin Ran; Fengmei Ke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.006

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.