Literature DB >> 22824304

Partial change in EphA4 knockout mouse phenotype: loss of diminished GFAP upregulation following spinal cord injury.

Kirsty J Dixon1, Kathryn M Munro, Andrew W Boyd, Perry F Bartlett, Ann M Turnley.   

Abstract

In a previous study we found that the EphA4 receptor inhibits regeneration following spinal cord injury by blocking regrowth of axons and regulation of astrocyte reactivity. In our original studies using EphA4 null mice [Goldshmit et al., J. Neurosci., 2004] we found attenuated astrocyte reactivity following spinal cord injury. Several other studies have now supported the role of EphA4 in regulating neural regeneration but a recent study [Herrmann et al., Exp. Neurol., 2010] did not find an effect of EphA4 on astrocyte reactivity. Re-examination of astrocytic gliosis following injury in our current cohort of EphA4 null mice revealed that they no longer showed attenuation of astrocyte reactivity, however other EphA4 null mouse phenotypes, such as decreased size of the dorsal funiculus were unaltered. We hypothesised that long-term breeding on the C57Bl/6 background may influence the EphA4-mediated astrocyte phenotype and compared astrocytic gliosis at 4 days following spinal cord injury in wildtype and EphA4 null mice on the C57Bl/6 background and backcrossed C57Bl/6×129Sv(F2) mice, as well as wildtype 129Sv mice. 129Sv mice had increased GFAP expression and increased numbers of reactive GFAP astrocytes compared to C57Bl/6 mice. There was no significant effect of EphA4 deletion on GFAP expression in C57Bl/6 mice or the F2 crosses other than a moderately decreased number of EphA4 null astrocytes in C57Bl/6 mice using one of two antibodies. Therefore, there has been an apparent change in EphA4-mediated astroglial phenotype associated with long term breeding of the EphA4 colony but it does not appear to be influenced by background mouse strain.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22824304     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.07.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  8 in total

Review 1.  Axon Guidance Molecules and Neural Circuit Remodeling After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Edmund R Hollis
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Therapeutic targeting of EPH receptors and their ligands.

Authors:  Andrew W Boyd; Perry F Bartlett; Martin Lackmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 3.  The glial scar in spinal cord injury and repair.

Authors:  Yi-Min Yuan; Cheng He
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 5.203

4.  Acute delivery of EphA4-Fc improves functional recovery after contusive spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  Mark Damien Spanevello; Sophie Ines Tajouri; Cornel Mirciov; Nyoman Kurniawan; Martin John Pearse; Louis Jerry Fabri; Catherine Mary Owczarek; Matthew Philip Hardy; Rebecca Anne Bradford; Melanie Louise Ramunno; Ann Maree Turnley; Marc Jan Ruitenberg; Andrew Wallace Boyd; Perry Francis Bartlett
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  C57BL/6 and Swiss Webster Mice Display Differences in Mobility, Gliosis, Microcavity Formation and Lesion Volume After Severe Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Harun Najib Noristani; Laetitia They; Florence Evelyne Perrin
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.505

6.  Targeting axon guidance cues for neural circuit repair after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Yimin Zou
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  EphA4 Obstructs Spinal Cord Neuron Regeneration by Promoting Excessive Activation of Astrocytes.

Authors:  Xiaogang Chen; Lin Zhang; Fu Hua; Yu Zhuang; Huan Liu; Shouguo Wang
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.231

8.  Use of longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging in preclinical models of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Harun Najib Noristani; Florence Evelyne Perrin
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.135

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.