Literature DB >> 22822299

Food-Sharing Networks in Lamalera, Indonesia: Status, Sharing, and Signaling.

David A Nolin1.   

Abstract

Costly signaling has been proposed as a possible mechanism to explain food sharing in foraging populations. This sharing-as-signaling hypothesis predicts an association between sharing and status. Using exponential random graph modeling (ERGM), this prediction is tested on a social network of between-household food-sharing relationships in the fishing and sea-hunting village of Lamalera, Indonesia. Previous analyses (Nolin 2010) have shown that most sharing in Lamalera is consistent with reciprocal altruism. The question addressed here is whether any additional variation may be explained as sharing-as-signaling by high-status households. The results show that high-status households both give and receive more than other households, a pattern more consistent with reciprocal altruism than costly signaling. However, once the propensity to reciprocate and household productivity are controlled, households of men holding leadership positions show greater odds of unreciprocated giving when compared to households of non-leaders. This pattern of excessive giving by leaders is consistent with the sharing-as-signaling hypothesis. Wealthy households show the opposite pattern, giving less and receiving more than other households. These households may reciprocate in a currency other than food or their wealth may attract favor-seeking behavior from others. Overall, status covariates explain little variation in the sharing network as a whole, and much of the sharing observed by high-status households is best explained by the same factors that explain sharing by other households. This pattern suggests that multiple mechanisms may operate simultaneously to promote sharing in Lamalera and that signaling may motivate some sharing by some individuals even within sharing regimes primarily maintained by other mechanisms.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22822299      PMCID: PMC3398706          DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Hum Behav        ISSN: 1090-5138            Impact factor:   4.178


  24 in total

1.  A statnet Tutorial.

Authors:  Steven M Goodreau; Mark S Handcock; David R Hunter; Carter T Butts; Martina Morris
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.440

2.  Biological signals as handicaps.

Authors:  A Grafen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process.

Authors:  A Grafen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring.

Authors:  M A Nowak; K Sigmund
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-06-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Biological markets.

Authors:  R Noë; P Hammerstein
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle).

Authors:  A Zahavi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1977-08-07       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Kin preference and partner choice: patrilineal descent and biological kinship in Lamaleran cooperative relationships.

Authors:  David A Nolin
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2011-05-26

8.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Hadza meat sharing.

Authors:  K Hawkes; J F. O'Connell; N G. Blurton Jones
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.178

10.  Food-Sharing Networks in Lamalera, Indonesia: Reciprocity, Kinship, and Distance.

Authors:  David A Nolin
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2010-10-01
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Social networks and health: a systematic review of sociocentric network studies in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Jessica M Perkins; S V Subramanian; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Food-Sharing Networks in Lamalera, Indonesia: Reciprocity, Kinship, and Distance.

Authors:  David A Nolin
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2010-10-01

3.  Good Samaritans in Networks: An Experiment on How Networks Influence Egalitarian Sharing and the Evolution of Inequality.

Authors:  Yen-Sheng Chiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Biological trade and markets.

Authors:  Peter Hammerstein; Ronald Noë
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Social connectedness is associated with food security among peri-urban Peruvian Amazonian communities.

Authors:  Gwenyth O Lee; Pamela J Surkan; Jon Zelner; Maribel Paredes Olórtegui; Pablo Peñataro Yori; Ramya Ambikapathi; Laura E Caulfield; Robert H Gilman; Margaret N Kosek
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2018-02-23

6.  Environmental heterogeneity and commodity sharing in smallholder agroecosystems.

Authors:  Stacey A Giroux; Paul McCord; Sara Lopus; Drew Gower; Jampel Dell'Angelo; Stephanie Dickinson; Xiwei Chen; Kelly K Caylor; Tom P Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The effect of group attachment and social position on prosocial behavior. Evidence from lab-in-the-field experiments.

Authors:  Delia Baldassarri; Guy Grossman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Does market integration buffer risk, erode traditional sharing practices and increase inequality? A test among Bolivian forager-farmers.

Authors:  Michael Gurven; Adrian V Jaeggi; Chris von Rueden; Paul L Hooper; Hillard Kaplan
Journal:  Hum Ecol Interdiscip J       Date:  2015-07-16

9.  Material wealth in 3D: Mapping multiple paths to prosperity in low- and middle- income countries.

Authors:  Daniel J Hruschka; Craig Hadley; Joseph Hackman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The dynamics of men's cooperation and social status in a small-scale society.

Authors:  Christopher R von Rueden; Daniel Redhead; Rick O'Gorman; Hillard Kaplan; Michael Gurven
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.