Literature DB >> 22822228

Improving outpatient services: the Southampton IBD virtual clinic.

Jo Hunter1, Andrew Claridge, Shirley James, David Chan, Bernard Stacey, Mike Stroud, Praful Patel, David Fine, J R Fraser Cummings.   

Abstract

The follow-up of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is challenging due to the relapsing remitting nature of the diseases, the wide spectrum of severity and complexity as well as the need for monitoring of long-term complications and drug treatments. Conventional outpatient follow-up lacks flexibility for patients and there are competing pressures for clinic time. Alternative follow-up pathways include telephone clinics, self-management programmes or discharging patients. The IBD virtual clinic (VC) is a further option. Patients with an established diagnosis for >2 years, who have been stable for >1 year, do not have primary sclerosing cholangitis and who give their consent, are entered into the VC system. Two months before their annual follow-up is due patients are sent blood test forms and a simple questionnaire with an information sheet. If they meet any of the criteria on the questionnaire, they are asked to contact the IBD specialist nursing team to discuss their situation. The blood test results and the patient's database entry are reviewed to ensure that they are not due surveillance investigations. The patients and their GPs then receive a letter informing them of their management plan. We currently follow-up 20% of the Southampton IBD cohort using the VC. The VC system is an innovative, efficient and patient-responsive method for following up mild to moderate IBD. It is well liked by patients but is dependent on a well-maintained database with good integration of IT systems and requires both clerical and IBD nurse specialist support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22822228     DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-100123rep

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  7 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of a virtual urology outpatient clinic.

Authors:  C Browne; N F Davis; E D Mac Craith; G M Lennon; D J Galvin; D W Mulvin
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Distance management of inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vivian W Huang; Krista M Reich; Richard N Fedorak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  New ways of working; delivering better care for people with long-term conditions.

Authors:  Victoria Tzortziou Brown; Irem Patel; Nicola Thomas; James Tomlinson; Rachel Roberts; Hugh Rayner; Neil Ashman; Sally Hull
Journal:  London J Prim Care (Abingdon)       Date:  2017-08-11

4.  The clinical and cost effectiveness of a virtual fracture clinic service: An interrupted time series analysis and before-and-after comparison.

Authors:  A McKirdy; A M Imbuldeniya
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Evaluating the impact of a 'virtual clinic' on patient experience, personal and provider costs of care in urinary incontinence: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Georgina Jones; Victoria Brennan; Richard Jacques; Hilary Wood; Simon Dixon; Stephen Radley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Atrial fibrillation care in rural communities: a mixed methods study of physician and patient perspectives.

Authors:  Kathy L Rush; Lindsay Burton; Fransien Van Der Merwe; Linda Hatt; Camille Galloway
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Virtualised care and COVID-19.

Authors:  M F O' Reilly; K Merghani; E Sheehan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 1.568

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.