Literature DB >> 22822200

Participants' responsibilities in clinical research.

David B Resnik1, Elizabeth Ness.   

Abstract

Discussions on the ethics and regulation of clinical research have a great deal to say about the responsibilities of investigators, sponsors, research institutions and institutional review boards, but very little about the responsibilities of research participants. In this article, we discuss the responsibilities of participants in clinical research. We argue that competent adult participants are responsible for complying with study requirements and fulfilling other obligations they undertake when they make an informed choice to enroll in a study. These responsibilities are based on duties related to promise-keeping, avoiding harm to one's self or others, beneficence and reciprocity. Investigators and research staff should inform participants about their responsibilities during the consent process, and should stress the importance of fulfilling study requirements. They should address any impediments to compliance, and they may provide participants with financial incentives for meeting study requirements. In very rare cases, coercive measures may be justified to prevent immanent harm to others resulting from non-compliance with study requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22822200      PMCID: PMC3962011          DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  26 in total

1.  Failing the public health--rofecoxib, Merck, and the FDA.

Authors:  Eric J Topol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Strategies to minimize risks and exploitation in phase one trials on healthy subjects.

Authors:  Adil E Shamoo; David B Resnik
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Scientific research is a moral duty.

Authors:  John Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Rethinking research ethics.

Authors:  Rosamond Rhodes
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  False data & the therapeutic misconception: two urgent problems in research ethics. False data and last hopes: enrolling ineligible patients in clinical trials.

Authors:  H Y Vanderpool; G B Weiss
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.683

6.  Setting the record straight in the breast-cancer trials.

Authors:  M Angell; J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-05-19       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Research participation and the right to withdraw.

Authors:  Sarah J L Edwards
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.898

8.  The patient's duty to adhere to prescribed treatment: an ethical analysis.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2005-04

9.  Motivations for participating in an HIV vaccine efficacy trial.

Authors:  Grant Colfax; Susan Buchbinder; Goli Vamshidar; Connie Celum; David McKirnan; Judith Neidig; Beryl Koblin; Marc Gurwith; Brad Bartholow
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 3.731

10.  Critical reflections on evidence, ethics and effectiveness in the management of tuberculosis: public health and global perspectives.

Authors:  Geetika Verma; Ross E G Upshur; Elizabeth Rea; Solomon R Benatar
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  8 in total

1.  When Subjects Violate the Research Covenant: Lessons Learned from a Failed Clinical Trial of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation.

Authors:  Stacy A Kahn; David T Rubin
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Subversive subjects: rule-breaking and deception in clinical trials.

Authors:  Rebecca Dresser
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 3.  Clinical Trials and the Role of the Oncology Clinical Trials Nurse.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ness; Cheryl Royce
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.208

Review 4.  Perioperative research fellowship: planning, implementation, experience.

Authors:  Stavros G Memtsoudis; Madhu Mazumdar; Ottokar Stundner; Mary J Hargett
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.288

5.  Willingness to Participate in Health Information Networks with Diverse Data Use: Evaluating Public Perspectives.

Authors:  Jodyn Platt; Minakshi Raj; Ayşe G Büyüktür; M Grace Trinidad; Olufunmilayo Olopade; Mark S Ackerman; Sharon Kardia
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2019-07-25

6.  Examining study participants' decision-making and ethics-related experiences in a dietary community randomized controlled trial in Malawi.

Authors:  Limbanazo Matandika; Kate Millar; Eric Umar; Edward Joy; Gabriella Chiutsi-Phiri; Joseph Mfutso-Bengo
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Understanding women's motivations to participate in MTN-003/VOICE, a phase 2b HIV prevention trial with low adherence.

Authors:  Ariana W K Katz; Barbara S Mensch; Kubashni Woeber; Petina Musara; Juliane Etima; Ariane van der Straten
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Personalized and long-term electronic informed consent in clinical research: stakeholder views.

Authors:  Evelien De Sutter; Pascal Borry; David Geerts; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 2.652

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.