Literature DB >> 22821694

MR imaging of the small bowel.

Gabriele Masselli1, Gianfranco Gualdi.   

Abstract

Small-bowel radiology has undergone dramatic changes in the past 2 decades. Despite important recent advances in small-bowel endoscopy, radiologic imaging remains important for patients suspected of having or with established small-bowel disease. Cross-sectional imaging techniques (computed tomography and magnetic resonance [MR] imaging), used to investigate both extraluminal abnormalities and intraluminal changes, have gradually replaced barium contrast examinations, which are, however, still used to examine early mucosal disease. MR imaging techniques clearly highlight endoluminal, mural and extramural enteric details and provide vascular and functional information, thereby enhancing the diagnostic value of these techniques in small-bowel diseases. Two MR imaging based techniques are currently utilized: MR enteroclysis and MR enterography. In enteroclysis, enteric contrast material is administered through a nasoenteric tube, whereas in enterography, large volumes of enteric contrast material are administered orally. MR enteroclysis ensures consistently better luminal distention than does MR enterography in both the jejunum and the ileum and more accurately depicts endoluminal abnormalities and early disease, particularly at the level of the jejunal loops. Moreover, MR enteroclysis provides a high level of accuracy in the diagnosis and exclusion of small-bowel inflammatory and neoplastic diseases and can be used for the first radiologic evaluation, while MR enterography may effectively be used to follow up both Crohn disease patients without jejunal disease and in pediatric patients where nasogastric intubation might be a problem. MR enteroclysis may also reveal subtle transition points or an obstruction in the lower small bowel, which may escape detection when more routine methods, including enterography, are used. MR imaging offers detailed morphologic information and functional data of small-bowel diseases and provides reliable evidence of normalcy, thereby allowing the diagnosis of early or subtle structural abnormalities and guiding treatment and decisions in patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22821694     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  41 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of stricturing Crohn's disease: Current clinical practice and future avenues.

Authors:  Dominik Bettenworth; Tobias M Nowacki; Friederike Cordes; Boris Buerke; Frank Lenze
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy: ESUR recommendations.

Authors:  Gabriele Masselli; Lorenzo Derchi; Josephine McHugo; Andrea Rockall; Peter Vock; Michael Weston; John Spencer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison of 3% sorbitol vs psyllium fibre as oral contrast agents in MR enterography.

Authors:  Sidharth Saini; Errol Colak; Shalini Anthwal; Paraskevi A Vlachou; Antony Raikhlin; Anish Kirpalani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Training readers to improve their accuracy in grading Crohn's disease activity on MRI.

Authors:  Jeroen A W Tielbeek; Shandra Bipat; Thierry N Boellaard; C Yung Nio; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  An overview of magnetic resonance enterography for Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Suresh Pola; Cynthia Santillan; Barrett G Levesque; Brian G Feagan; William J Sandborn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  In vivo delivery, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Hamed Arami; Amit Khandhar; Denny Liggitt; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 54.564

7.  Assessment of acute intestinal graft versus host disease by abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Johannes Budjan; Henrik J Michaely; Ulrike Attenberger; Stefan Haneder; Daniela Heidenreich; Sebastian Kreil; Florian Nolte; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Stefan O Schoenberg; Stefan A Klein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Contributions of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Gastroenterological Practice: MRIs for GIs.

Authors:  Christopher G Roth; Dina Halegoua-De Marzio; Flavius F Guglielmo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance enterography for the detection of mesenteric small bowel tumours.

Authors:  Elisa Amzallag-Bellenger; Philippe Soyer; Coralie Barbe; Marie-Danièle Diebold; Guillaume Cadiot; Christine Hoeffel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  [Protection of the unborn child in diagnostic and interventional radiological procedures].

Authors:  A Hojreh; H Prosch; G Karanikas; P Homolka; S Trattnig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.