Literature DB >> 22821508

Evolving trends in maternal fetal medicine referrals in a rural state using telemedicine.

Everett F Magann1, Janet Bronstein, Samantha S McKelvey, Paul Wendel, Dora M Smith, Curtis L Lowery.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine maternal fetal medicine (MFM) referral trends in a Medicaid population over time. STUDY
DESIGN: Sixteen clinical guidelines and 23 clinical conditions were identified where co-management/consultation with MFM specialist is recommended. Linked Medicaid claims and birth certificate data for 2001-2006 were used to identify pregnancies with these conditions and whether they received co-management/consultation from a MFM specialist.
RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2006, there were 108,703 pregnancies with delivery of 110,890 neonates. Forty-five percent had one or more of the conditions identified for co-management/consultation. Overall pregnancies receiving MFM contact remained unchanged at 22.2% in 2001 and 22.1% in 2006. However, face to face contacts decreased from 14.6% (2001) to 8.7% (2006) while telemedicine consults increased from 7.6% (2001) to 13.3% (2006). Health departments were most likely and family practitioners least likely to refer to MFM (p<0.001). Pregnancy complications leading to MFM referrals include cardiac complications, renal disease, systemic disorders, PPROM, suspected fetal abnormalities, and cervical insufficiency.
CONCLUSION: Referral of high-risk pregnancies to MFMs varies with the level of expertise at the primary prenatal site. Increased contact between MFMs and local providers increased MFM referrals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22821508      PMCID: PMC3880183          DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2465-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  6 in total

1.  Workforce projections for subspecialists in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  W H Pearse; N F Gant; A P Hagner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The role of the maternal-fetal medicine specialist in high-risk obstetric care.

Authors:  Melissa C Sisson; Patricia M Witcher; Cathy Stubsten
Journal:  Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.326

3.  Defining the relationship between obstetricians and maternal-fetal medicine specialists.

Authors:  A M Vintzileos; C V Ananth; J C Smulian; W E Scorza; R A Knuppel
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Maternal-fetal medicine specialist density is inversely associated with maternal mortality ratios.

Authors:  Scott A Sullivan; Elizabeth G Hill; Roger B Newman; M Kathryn Menard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  ANGELS and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences paradigm for distant obstetrical care delivery.

Authors:  Curtis Lowery; Janet Bronstein; Judith McGhee; Rachel Ott; E Albert Reece; Glen P Mays
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Re-evaluating the role of the MFM specialist: lead, follow, or get out of the way.

Authors:  Robert D Eden; Ann Penka; David W Britt; Ellen J Landsberger; Mark I Evans
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2005-10
  6 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Addressing health disparities in rural communities using telehealth.

Authors:  James P Marcin; Ulfat Shaikh; Robin H Steinhorn
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  A Family Medicine Health Technology Strategy for Achieving the Triple Aim for US Health Care.

Authors:  Robert L Phillips; Andrew W Bazemore; Jennifer E DeVoe; Thomas J Weida; Alex H Krist; Michael F Dulin; Frances E Biagioli
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Location of childbirth for rural women: implications for maternal levels of care.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Michelle M Casey; Peiyin Hung; Shailendra Prasad; Ira S Moscovice
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Factors Associated with First-Time Telehealth Utilization for Marshallese Living in the United States.

Authors:  Jennifer A Andersen; Holly C Felix; Hari Eswaran; Nalin Payakachat; Don E Willis; Cari Bogulski; Pearl A McElfish
Journal:  Telemed Rep       Date:  2021-10-07

5.  Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Bahareh Goodarzi; Annika Walker; Lianne Holten; Linda Schoonmade; Pim Teunissen; François Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.