Literature DB >> 22821280

Sources of fluorescent dissolved organic matter in high salinity seawater (Bohai Bay, China).

Hao Chen1, Binghui Zheng.   

Abstract

Fluorescent dissolved organic matter (FDOM) identified in coastal waters within a large salinity range had been widely reported in previous studies, which stated that conservative mixing of terrestrially derived and river-transported FDOM by clear seawaters could account for the relatively low FDOM fluorescence signals in high salinity seawaters. This study aimed at testing the conservative mixing model in high salinity seawaters in a shallow bay (Bohai Bay, China) with low river flow in a dry season. The water showed high salinities varying in a narrow range (30.52 - 2.07), and salinity effects on fluorescence quantum yields therefore less likely introduced complications to fluorescence data analyses. By applying a parallel factor analysis to fluorescence excitation emission matrices of the water samples, we identified a tyrosine-like FDOM component, a tryptophan-like FDOM component, and two humic substances-like FDOM components. Based on a theoretical analysis, we found that dissolved organic carbon concentrations and suspended solid concentrations of the bulk-water samples as well as the maximum fluorescence signals of each identified FDOM component showed spatial distributions that could not be accounted for by the conservative mixing model. Marine autochthonous processes including microbial activities and FDOM releasing from resuspended sediment were likely to be invoked.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22821280     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-1085-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  7 in total

1.  Differentiating with fluorescence spectroscopy the sources of dissolved organic matter in soils subjected to drying

Authors: 
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Fluorescence spectroscopy reveals ubiquitous presence of oxidized and reduced quinones in dissolved organic matter.

Authors:  Rose M Cory; Diane M McKnight
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Characterizing natural organic material from the Occoquan Watershed (Northern Virginia, US) using fluorescence spectroscopy and PARAFAC.

Authors:  R David Holbrook; James H Yen; Thomas J Grizzard
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 4.  Marine optical biogeochemistry: the chemistry of ocean color.

Authors:  Paula G Coble
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  The contribution of phytoplankton degradation to chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) in eutrophic shallow lakes: field and experimental evidence.

Authors:  Yunlin Zhang; Mark A van Dijk; Mingliang Liu; Guangwei Zhu; Boqiang Qin
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Characterizing natural dissolved organic matter in a freshly submerged catchment (Three Gorges Dam, China) using UV absorption, fluorescence spectroscopy and PARAFAC.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Binghui Zheng
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.915

7.  Numerical investigation of nutrient limitations in the Bohai Sea.

Authors:  Hao Liu; Baoshu Yin
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.130

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  UVA illumination-induced optical coupling between tryptophan and natural dissolved organic matter.

Authors:  Xuechun Wang; Hao Chen; Kun Lei; Zhong Sun
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Comparison of the MBBR denitrification carriers for advanced nitrogen removal of wastewater treatment plant effluent.

Authors:  Quan Yuan; Haiyan Wang; Qianyu Hang; Yangfan Deng; Kai Liu; Chunmei Li; Shengzhi Zheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.223

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.