Literature DB >> 22820613

The care processes for acute cholecystitis according to clinical practice guidelines based on the Japanese administrative database.

Atsuhiko Murata1, Kohji Okamoto, Shinya Matsuda, Kazuaki Kuwabara, Yukako Ichimiya, Yasufumi Matsuda, Tatsuhiko Kubo, Yoshihisa Fujino, Kenji Fujimori, Hiromasa Horiguchi.   

Abstract

Acute cholecystitis is one of the most frequently encountered conditions in daily practice in Japan. However, there is a shortage of detailed data about treatments that have been performed according to the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for acute cholecystitis. We therefore examined the management of acute cholecystitis for adherence to the appropriate CPGs using the Japanese administrative database associated with the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) system. We collected data from 6,070 patients with acute cholecystitis, examining for the application of four recommended treatments (administration of antimicrobial drugs and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and performance of early and laparoscopic cholecystectomy). The patients were classified according to the procedures documented for each case: no gallbladder drainage (n = 4,333), gallbladder drainage without supportive care (ventilation or hemodiafiltration or the use of vasopressor) (n = 1,591) and gallbladder drainage and supportive care (n = 146). Multiple logistic regression models revealed that patients with gallbladder drainage without supportive care and those with gallbladder drainage and supportive care significantly higher received administration of antimicrobial drugs and NSAIDs, while these patients underwent less early or laparoscopic cholecystectomy than did patients without gallbladder drainage, after adjusting for potential confounding effects of the clinical variables. This study demonstrated that there were various differences with regard to the performance of recommended treatments between the levels of procedures required for acute cholecystitis. In addition, this administrative database was a feasible tool for the evaluation of care processes and will provide useful information contributing to improved quality of medical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22820613     DOI: 10.1620/tjem.227.237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med        ISSN: 0040-8727            Impact factor:   1.848


  3 in total

1.  Time trend of medical economic outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer in Japan: a national database analysis.

Authors:  Atsuhiko Murata; Kohji Okamoto; Keiji Muramatsu; Shinya Matsuda
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Nereo Vettoretto; Gianfranco Silecchia; Carlo Bergamini; Pietro Maida; Pietro Lombari; Piero Narilli; Domenico Marchi; Alessandro Carrara; Maria Grazia Esposito; Stefania Fiume; Giuseppe Miranda; Simona Barlera; Marina Davoli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Factor Analysis Influencing Postoperative Hospital Stay and Medical Costs for Patients with Definite, Suspected, or Unmatched Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis according to the Tokyo Guidelines 2013.

Authors:  Aoi Hayasaki; Koji Takahashi; Takehiro Fujii; Koji Kumamoto; Koji Fujii; Eiichi Matsumoto; Shigeki Miyahara; Tsukasa Kusuta; Yoshinori Azumi; Shuji Isaji
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.260

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.