Literature DB >> 22820453

How obstructing is an obstacle? The influence of starting posture on obstacle avoidance.

Rudmer Menger1, Stefan Van der Stigchel, H Chris Dijkerman.   

Abstract

The introduction of non-target objects into a workspace leads to temporal and spatial adjustments of reaching trajectories towards a target. Currently, there are two different explanations for this phenomenon: the non-target objects are considered as either physical obstacles to which we maintain a preferred distance (see Tresilian, 1998) or as distractors that interfere with movement planning (see Tipper, Howard, & Jackson, 1997). These components are difficult to disentangle, however. Our aim was to determine the unique contribution of the avoidance of a physical obstacle to the adjustments of reaching trajectories. In this study, we manipulate the degree of physical obstruction by non-target objects while keeping the a priori visual layout of the workspace more or less constant. This is achieved by placing participants in different starting postures with respect to the orientation of their limb segments. Participants reach towards and grasp target objects with non-targets present in the workspace in a frontal and a lateral starting posture. In the frontal conditions participants showed larger movements away from the non-target on the ipsilateral side of the workspace than in the lateral conditions. The results provide evidence for the interpretation that non-targets influence the movement trajectory partly because they are 'obstructing'.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22820453     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  8 in total

1.  Why does an obstacle just below the digits' paths not influence a grasping movement while an obstacle to the side of their paths does?

Authors:  Rebekka Verheij; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Outsider interference: no role for motor lateralization in determining the strength of avoidance responses during reaching.

Authors:  Rudmer Menger; Stefan Van der Stigchel; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Reaching around obstacles accounts for uncertainty in coordinate transformations.

Authors:  Parisa Abedi Khoozani; Dimitris Voudouris; Gunnar Blohm; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The effect of similarity: non-spatial features modulate obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  Rudmer Menger; H Chris Dijkerman; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  It is the flash which appears, the movement will follow: Investigating the relation between spatial attention and obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  Rudmer Menger; H Chris Dijkerman; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

6.  Keeping Safe: Intra-individual Consistency in Obstacle Avoidance Behaviour Across Grasping and Locomotion Tasks.

Authors:  Karina Kangur; Jutta Billino; Constanze Hesse
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-02-01

7.  Dyadic movement synchronization while performing incongruent trajectories requires mutual adaptation.

Authors:  Tamara Lorenz; Björn N S Vlaskamp; Anna-Maria Kasparbauer; Alexander Mörtl; Sandra Hirche
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The Effect of Gaze Position on Reaching Movements in an Obstacle Avoidance Task.

Authors:  Alasdair Iain Ross; Thomas Schenk; Constanze Hesse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.