Literature DB >> 22820343

Extrastriate cortex and medial temporal lobe regions respond differentially to visual feature overlap within preferred stimulus category.

M E Mundy1, P E Downing, K S Graham.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that domain-specific regions in extrastriate cortex, parahippocampal cortex and the medial temporal lobe (MTL, particularly the hippocampus, HC, and perirhinal cortex, PrC) may respond differently to the degree of feature complexity present in sets of visual stimuli, with the latter two regions tuned to represent the differences among stimuli with a high degree of visual overlap or featural ambiguity (Graham, Barense, & Lee, 2010; Cowell, Bussey, & Saksida, 2010a). To test this prediction, healthy participants viewed blocks containing visually similar or visually different exemplars from four stimulus categories (scenes, faces, inanimate objects and animate objects). Independent functional regions of interest were identified in extrastriate and MTL regions that were preferentially responsive to one or more of these visual categories, and the main experimental data interrogated for any evidence of an interaction between visual category and degree of feature overlap. In PrC and posterior HC (PostHC) viewing sets of stimuli with a large number of overlapping features resulted in greater activity than blocks containing items that were more visually distinct. The opposite pattern was found in fusiform face area (FFA), parahippocampal place area (PPA) and lateral occipital complex (LOC). The increased response in the HC and PrC to high visual similarity was seen only for visual categories that effectively activate these regions (PrC-faces and objects; PostHC-scenes). This study confirms that regions throughout the visual ventral stream, parahippocampal cortex and MTL are engaged differentially by visual complexity, consistent with recent lesion experiments in which MTL damage affects discrimination and learning of, as well as recognition memory for, exemplars with a high degree of visual feature overlap.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22820343     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  14 in total

1.  Perceiving nonverbal behavior: neural correlates of processing movement fluency and contingency in dyadic interactions.

Authors:  Alexandra L Georgescu; Bojana Kuzmanovic; Natacha S Santos; Ralf Tepest; Gary Bente; Marc Tittgemeyer; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Locus Coeruleus Activity Strengthens Prioritized Memories Under Arousal.

Authors:  David V Clewett; Ringo Huang; Rico Velasco; Tae-Ho Lee; Mara Mather
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Lateral occipitotemporal cortex (LOTC) activity is greatest while viewing dance compared to visualization and movement: learning and expertise effects.

Authors:  Paula M Di Nota; Gabriella Levkov; Rachel Bar; Joseph F X DeSouza
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Detecting changes in scenes: the hippocampus is critical for strength-based perception.

Authors:  Mariam Aly; Charan Ranganath; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Beyond the FFA: The role of the ventral anterior temporal lobes in face processing.

Authors:  Jessica A Collins; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  A critical role for the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex in perceptual learning of scenes and faces: complementary findings from amnesia and FMRI.

Authors:  Matthew E Mundy; Paul E Downing; Dominic M Dwyer; Robert C Honey; Kim S Graham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Dissociable roles of the inferior longitudinal fasciculus and fornix in face and place perception.

Authors:  Carl J Hodgetts; Mark Postans; Jonathan P Shine; Derek K Jones; Andrew D Lawrence; Kim S Graham
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Constructing, Perceiving, and Maintaining Scenes: Hippocampal Activity and Connectivity.

Authors:  Peter Zeidman; Sinéad L Mullally; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  Remembering Preservation in Hippocampal Amnesia.

Authors:  Ian A Clark; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Perceptual Integration Deficits in Autism Spectrum Disorders Are Associated with Reduced Interhemispheric Gamma-Band Coherence.

Authors:  Ina Peiker; Nicole David; Till R Schneider; Guido Nolte; Daniel Schöttle; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.