Literature DB >> 22819880

A 5-year experience with cardiopulmonary resuscitation using extracorporeal life support in non-postcardiotomy patients with cardiac arrest.

Assad Haneya1, Alois Philipp, Claudius Diez, Simon Schopka, Thomas Bein, Markus Zimmermann, Matthias Lubnow, Andreas Luchner, Ayman Agha, Michael Hilker, Stephan Hirt, Christof Schmid, Thomas Müller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using extracorporeal life support (ECLS) system has been successfully used to support patients with in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA, OHCA) when conventional measures have failed. The purpose of the current study is to report on our experience with extracorporeal CPR in non-postcardiotomy patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a total of 85 consecutive adult patients, who have been treated with ECLS between January 2007 and January 2012.
RESULTS: The mean CPR duration was 40 min (20-70 min). The mean ECLS support duration was 49 h (12-92 h). Twenty-eight patients (33%) had ECLS related complications. Forty patients (47%) were successfully weaned and 29 patients (34%) survived to hospital discharge. Among survivors, 93% were without severe neurologic deficit. Duration of CPR was shorter for survivors than for non-survivors [(25: 20-50 min) vs. (50: 25-86 min); p=0.003]. Immediately after ECLS start, the mean blood lactate level was lower (p=0.003), and the mean pH value was higher in the survivors' group (p<0.0001) compared to the non-survivors' group. The CPR duration for the IHCA group (25: 20-50 min) was shorter compared to the OHCA group (70: 55-110min; p<0.0001). The survival rate in this group was higher compared to the OHCA group (42% vs. 15%; p<0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: CPR using modern miniaturized ECLS systems should be established in the treatment of prolonged cardiac arrest and unsuccessful conventional CPR in selected patients. CPR with ECLS for OHCA has worse outcomes compared to IHCA. Duration of CPR was independent risk factor for mortality after extracorporeal CPR.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22819880     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  42 in total

1.  Percutaneous extracorporeal life support for patients in therapy refractory cardiogenic shock: initial results of an interdisciplinary team.

Authors:  Sabina Guenther; Hans D Theiss; Matthias Fischer; Stefan Sattler; Sven Peterss; Frank Born; Maximilian Pichlmaier; Steffen Massberg; Christian Hagl; Nawid Khaladj
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

2.  Comparison of extracorporeal and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A meta-analysis of 2 260 patients with cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Gan-Nan Wang; Xu-Feng Chen; Li Qiao; Yong Mei; Jin-Ru Lv; Xi-Hua Huang; Bin Shen; Jin-Song Zhang
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2017

3.  Door-to-implantation time of extracorporeal life support systems predicts mortality in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jürgen Leick; Christoph Liebetrau; Sebastian Szardien; Ulrich Fischer-Rasokat; Matthias Willmer; Arnaud van Linden; Johannes Blumenstein; Holger Nef; Andreas Rolf; Matthias Arlt; Thomas Walther; Christian Hamm; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 4.  Extracorporeal life support in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Corey E Ventetuolo; Christopher S Muratore
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 5.  What's new in ECMO: scoring the bad indications.

Authors:  Ken Parhar; Alain Vuylsteke
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  New horizons of non-emergent use of extracorporeal membranous oxygenator support.

Authors:  George Makdisi; Peter B Makdisi; I-Wen Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-02

7.  Descriptive analysis of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-An ELSO registry study.

Authors:  Nathan L Haas; Ryan A Coute; Cindy H Hsu; James A Cranford; Robert W Neumar
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  Adenosine 2A Receptor Activation Attenuates Ischemia Reperfusion Injury During Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Authors:  James H Mehaffey; Dustin Money; Eric J Charles; Sarah Schubert; Angela Fernandez Piñeros; Di Wu; Sai Vineela Bontha; Robert Hawkins; Nicholas R Teman; Victor E Laubach; Valeria R Mas; Curtis G Tribble; Daniel G Maluf; Ashish K Sharma; Zequan Yang; Irving L Kron; Mark E Roeser
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Outcome predictors in cardiopulmonary resuscitation facilitated by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Christian Jung; Kyra Janssen; Mirko Kaluza; Georg Fuernau; Tudor Constantin Poerner; Michael Fritzenwanger; Ruediger Pfeifer; Holger Thiele; Hans Reiner Figulla
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 10.  [Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Indications, limitations and practical implementation].

Authors:  D Lunz; A Philipp; M Dolch; F Born; Y A Zausig
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.