OBJECTIVE: Evidence from pre-clinical studies suggests inhibition of stearoyl co-A desaturase-1 (SCD-1) activity improves insulin sensitivity. Translation of these findings to humans remains less defined. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the association between different measures of SCD-1 activity and incident diabetes in a large, prospective human study. METHODS: In 2738 white participants (aged 45-64 yrs, 47% men) who were free of diabetes at baseline, SCD-1 activity was estimated at baseline by plasma fatty acid ratios in cholesterol esters (SCD16c=16:1n-7/16:0, SCD18c =18:1n-9/18:0) and in phospholipids (SCD16p=16:1n-7/16:0, SCD18p=18:1n-9/18:0). Incident diabetes was ascertained during 3 follow-up visits. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the association between estimated SCD-1 activity and incident diabetes. RESULTS: During follow-up (mean 8.0±SE 2.1 years), 207 (7.6%) participants developed diabetes. After adjusting for age and sex, higher SCD16c, higher SCD16p, and lower SCD18p were significantly associated with incident diabetes. After additional adjustment for education, parental history of diabetes, smoking, dietary intake (carbohydrate, fiber, saturated/monounsaturated/polyunsaturated fat), alcohol use, physical activity, body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio, blood pressure, and lipid composition - only SCD16c remained significantly associated with incident diabetes (Hazard Ratio=1.1 linearly across decreasing quintiles, 95% CI 1.01-1.30; p =0.03) which remained nominally associated after adjusting for insulin resistance (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In a large community-based prospective cohort study, the estimate of SCD-1 activity by SCD16c had the strongest association with incident diabetes. Refinement of SCD-1 measurement and replication of its association with incident diabetes in an independent cohort is recommended.
OBJECTIVE: Evidence from pre-clinical studies suggests inhibition of stearoyl co-A desaturase-1 (SCD-1) activity improves insulin sensitivity. Translation of these findings to humans remains less defined. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the association between different measures of SCD-1 activity and incident diabetes in a large, prospective human study. METHODS: In 2738 white participants (aged 45-64 yrs, 47% men) who were free of diabetes at baseline, SCD-1 activity was estimated at baseline by plasma fatty acid ratios in cholesterol esters (SCD16c=16:1n-7/16:0, SCD18c =18:1n-9/18:0) and in phospholipids (SCD16p=16:1n-7/16:0, SCD18p=18:1n-9/18:0). Incident diabetes was ascertained during 3 follow-up visits. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the association between estimated SCD-1 activity and incident diabetes. RESULTS: During follow-up (mean 8.0±SE 2.1 years), 207 (7.6%) participants developed diabetes. After adjusting for age and sex, higher SCD16c, higher SCD16p, and lower SCD18p were significantly associated with incident diabetes. After additional adjustment for education, parental history of diabetes, smoking, dietary intake (carbohydrate, fiber, saturated/monounsaturated/polyunsaturated fat), alcohol use, physical activity, body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio, blood pressure, and lipid composition - only SCD16c remained significantly associated with incident diabetes (Hazard Ratio=1.1 linearly across decreasing quintiles, 95% CI 1.01-1.30; p =0.03) which remained nominally associated after adjusting for insulin resistance (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In a large community-based prospective cohort study, the estimate of SCD-1 activity by SCD16c had the strongest association with incident diabetes. Refinement of SCD-1 measurement and replication of its association with incident diabetes in an independent cohort is recommended.
Authors: Haiming Cao; Kristin Gerhold; Jared R Mayers; Michelle M Wiest; Steven M Watkins; Gökhan S Hotamisligil Journal: Cell Date: 2008-09-19 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Allison M Hodge; Dallas R English; Kerin O'Dea; Andrew J Sinclair; Maria Makrides; Robert A Gibson; Graham G Giles Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Bruce B Duncan; Maria Inês Schmidt; James S Pankow; Christie M Ballantyne; David Couper; Alvaro Vigo; Ron Hoogeveen; Aaron R Folsom; Gerardo Heiss Journal: Diabetes Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: S Jacobs; K Schiller; E Jansen; A Fritsche; C Weikert; R di Giuseppe; H Boeing; M B Schulze; J Kröger Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Nirupa R Matthan; Esther M Ooi; Linda Van Horn; Marian L Neuhouser; Richard Woodman; Alice H Lichtenstein Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Young Ju Lee; Ayoung Lee; Hye Jin Yoo; Minjoo Kim; Minkyung Kim; Sun Ha Jee; Dong Yeob Shin; Jong Ho Lee Journal: Nutr J Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Maria Grau-Perez; Chin-Chi Kuo; Matthew O Gribble; Poojitha Balakrishnan; Miranda Jones Spratlen; Dhananjay Vaidya; Kevin A Francesconi; Walter Goessler; Eliseo Guallar; Ellen K Silbergeld; Jason G Umans; Lyle G Best; Elisa T Lee; Barbara V Howard; Shelley A Cole; Ana Navas-Acien Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 9.031