Literature DB >> 22819426

Stress imaging use and repeat revascularization among medicare patients with high-risk coronary artery disease.

Joseph S Rossi1, Jerome J Federspiel, Daniel J Crespin, Timothy S Carey, Brett C Sheridan, Sally C Stearns.   

Abstract

The optimal use of stress testing after coronary revascularization remains unclear, and overuse of stress testing might increase the rates of repeat revascularization. We analyzed the association at both the patient and regional level between the use of stress testing and repeat revascularization for a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries receiving revascularization within 30 days of an admission for symptomatic coronary artery disease. The sample consisted of 219,748 Medicare beneficiaries aged >65 years who received percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac bypass artery grafting after hospital admission for symptomatic coronary artery disease in 2003 to 2004. Medicare claims data through 2008 identified the use of stress testing and repeat revascularization. The associations between the cumulative incidence of stress testing and repeat revascularization were analyzed using linear regression analysis. Within 6 years of the initial revascularization, the cumulative incidence of events was 0.61 for stress testing and 0.23 for repeat revascularization. Most (53.1%) repeat revascularizations were preceded by a stress test. Only 10.3% of repeat revascularization procedures were preceded by myocardial infarction. The 4-year cumulative incidence of repeat revascularization and stress testing varied between the Hospital Referral Regions represented by the sample, and the positive correlation between the rates by the health referral region accounted for only a small portion of the total health referral region variation in revascularization rates. In conclusion, stress testing is commonly performed among Medicare patients after the initial revascularization, and most repeat procedures are performed for stable coronary artery disease. The variation in stress testing patterns only explained a modest fraction of the regional variation in the repeat revascularization rates.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22819426      PMCID: PMC3622200          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.06.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Why all the focus on cardiac imaging?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Thomas H Marwick; William A Zoghbi; W Gregory Hundley; Christopher M Kramer; Stephan Achenbach; Vasken Dilsizian; Morton J Kern; Y Chandrashekhar; Jagat Narula
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-07

2.  Patterns of cardiac stress testing after revascularization in community practice.

Authors:  Bimal R Shah; Patricia A Cowper; Sean M O'Brien; Neil Jensen; Matthew Drawz; Manesh R Patel; Pamela S Douglas; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Association between physician billing and cardiac stress testing patterns following coronary revascularization.

Authors:  Bimal R Shah; Patricia A Cowper; Sean M O'Brien; Neil Jensen; Manesh R Patel; Pamela S Douglas; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Ralph G Brindis; Pamela S Douglas; Robert C Hendel; Eric D Peterson; Michael J Wolk; Joseph M Allen; Manesh R Patel; Ira E Raskin; Robert C Hendel; Timothy M Bateman; Manuel D Cerqueira; Raymond J Gibbons; Linda D Gillam; John A Gillespie; Robert C Hendel; Ami E Iskandrian; Scott D Jerome; Harlan M Krumholz; Joseph V Messer; John A Spertus; Stephen A Stowers
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  ACCF/ASE/ACEP/AHA/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 appropriateness criteria for stress echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Bijoy Khandheria; Raymond F Stainback; Neil J Weissman; Eric D Peterson; Robert C Hendel; Raymond F Stainback; Michael Blaivas; Roger D Des Prez; Linda D Gillam; Terry Golash; Loren F Hiratzka; William G Kussmaul; Arthur J Labovitz; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Frederick A Masoudi; Paul H Mayo; David Porembka; John A Spertus; L Samuel Wann; Susan E Wiegers; Ralph G Brindis; Pamela S Douglas; Robert C Hendel; Manesh R Patel; Eric D Peterson; Michael J Wolk; Joseph M Allen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 24.094

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Practice-Level Variation in Outpatient Cardiac Care and Association With Outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Clough; Rahul Rajkumar; Matthew T Crim; Lesli S Ott; Nihar R Desai; Patrick H Conway; Sha Maresh; Daver C Kahvecioglu; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.501

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.