Literature DB >> 2281941

Relationships between intrapopulational and interpopulational genetic diversity in man.

G Livshits1, M Nei.   

Abstract

The bottleneck effect (or extended period of reduced population size) is known to increase genetic distance (D) substantially, and this can be a serious factor that disturbs the phylogenetic relationships of populations inferred from genetic distance estimates. The bottleneck effect is also known to be a factor that disturbs the hierarchial relationships of the fixation indices (FST) or the coefficients of gene differentiation (GST) in subdivided populations. To examine the extent of the bottleneck effect on D and GST in human populations, the D and GST values were computed for various groups of populations from around the world, and their relationships with within-population heterozygosities were examined by using gene frequency data for protein and immunological loci. The results obtained indicate that the D value between a pair of populations is negatively correlated with the average within-population heterozygosity. This suggests that genetic distance estimates for small populations are seriously affected by the bottleneck effect, and that phylogenetic trees should be studied by taking into account this factor. The bottleneck effect on GST was also revealed from examination of the total gene diversity HT and its components, interpopulational genetic variation (DST) and intrapopulational genetic variation (HS). That is, a large value of GST in small populations was sometimes associated with the decrease of HS rather than the increase of DST. Generally speaking, however, GST was larger when geographically distant populations were considered than when closely located populations were considered. When there is any trace of bottleneck effects, phylogenetic trees should be constructed by a method in which the rate of evoluationary change is allowed to vary from branch to branch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2281941     DOI: 10.1080/03014469000001272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Biol        ISSN: 0301-4460            Impact factor:   1.533


  7 in total

1.  DNA diversity of human populations from Eastern Europe and Siberia studied by multilocus DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  E V Shabrova; E K Khusnutdinova; L A Tarskaia; A I Mikulich; N N Abolmasov; S A Limborska
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 3.291

2.  Genetic affinities of Jewish populations.

Authors:  G Livshits; R R Sokal; E Kobyliansky
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  mtDNA and Native Americans: a Southern perspective.

Authors:  R L Cann
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Phylogenetic relationship analysis of Iranians and other world populations using allele frequencies at 12 polymorphic markers.

Authors:  Zahra Fazeli; Sadeq Vallian
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  The structure of human mitochondrial DNA variation.

Authors:  D A Merriwether; A G Clark; S W Ballinger; T G Schurr; H Soodyall; T Jenkins; S T Sherry; D C Wallace
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  A quantitative test of the neutral theory using pooled allozyme data.

Authors:  D O Skibinski; M Woodwark; R D Ward
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  DNA sequences of Alu elements indicate a recent replacement of the human autosomal genetic complement.

Authors:  A Knight; M A Batzer; M Stoneking; H K Tiwari; W D Scheer; R J Herrera; P L Deininger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.