Literature DB >> 22819313

Is the impact of the extent of lymphadenectomy in radical prostatectomy related to the disease risk? A single center prospective study.

Jindong Ji1, Hexing Yuan, Liangliang Wang, Jianquan Hou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the extent of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. Impact of the extent of PLND may be determined by the disease risk. The aim of our study was to find the association between the extent of PLND on biochemical progression and disease risk.
METHODS: The study included 360 consecutive patients treated with RP for clinically localized prostate cancer at our department between 2000 and 2003. Patients were randomized to receive extended PLND (n = 180) and standard PLND (n = 180) at RP. Clinical and pathological data were prospectively collected. The patients did not receive any neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. The relation of disease risk and the extent of PLND to biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) were examined.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, prostate-specific antigen, and other preoperative features in patients who underwent standard and extended PLND. Mean patient age was 68 y old and median follow-up was 74 mo. BPFS for the standard PLND group and the extended PLND group was 90.1% and 91.3% in low risk disease (log rank P = 0.807), 73.1% and 85.7% in intermediate risk disease (log rank P = 0.042), and 51.1% and 71.4% in high risk disease (log rank P = 0.036), respectively. In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, extended PLND was an independent prognostic factor of biochemical progression-free survival when adjusting for other clinical and pathologic features.
CONCLUSIONS: In intermediate and high risk patients, extended PLND positively affects BPFS. In low risk patients, extended PLND may be omitted to reduce operation time and complications.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22819313     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.06.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  22 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on the efficacy of extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Liang Gao; Lu Yang; Xiao Lv; Siyuan Bu; Fan Wan; Shengqiang Qian; Qiang Wei; Ping Han; Tianyong Fan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Current status of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ilija Aleksic; Tyler Luthringer; Vladimir Mouraviev; David M Albala
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-12-11

Review 3.  The survival benefit of lymph node dissection at the time of removal of kidney, prostate and urothelial carcinomas: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Karim Bensalah; Morgan Roupret; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  High-risk prostate cancer-classification and therapy.

Authors:  Albert J Chang; Karen A Autio; Mack Roach; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  How to minimize lymphoceles and treat clinically symptomatic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hak J Lee; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  [Pelvic lymph node dissection. Complication management].

Authors:  D Weckermann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  The impact of extended lymph node dissection versus neoadjuvant therapy with limited lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Takuma Narita; Takuya Koie; Teppei Ookubo; Koji Mitsuzuka; Shintaro Narita; Hayato Yamamoto; Takamitsu Inoue; Shingo Hatakeyama; Sadafumi Kawamura; Tatsuo Tochigi; Tomonori Habuchi; Yoichi Arai; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  Is extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer the only recommended option? A systematic over-view of the literature.

Authors:  Thomas Rees; Nicholas Raison; Mohammed Iqbal Sheikh; Zahra Jaffry; Sanjeev Madaan; Ben Challacombe; Kamran Ahmed; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-12

Review 9.  Therapeutic Value of Standard Versus Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michele Colicchia; Vidit Sharma; Firas Abdollah; Alberto Briganti; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  Guidance on patient consultation. Current evidence for prostate-specific antigen screening in healthy men and treatment options for men with proven localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Giovannalberto Pini; Justin Collins; Pirus Ghadjar; Peter Wiklund
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.