Literature DB >> 22819133

Can pretreatment ADC values predict recurrence of bladder cancer after transurethral resection?

Hiroyuki Funatsu1, Akihiro Imamura, Hideyuki Takano, Takeshi Ueda, Takashi Uno.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the association between the pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and recurrence of bladder cancer after transurethral resection.
METHODS: Patients with superficial bladder cancer were identified. Mean ADC values of the tumors were compared between patients with and without recurrence following trans-urethral resection. A receiver-operator characteristic curve was used for determining the optimal cutoff ADC value. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the effect of ADC values and other factors.
RESULTS: With a mean follow-up period of 25 months, bladder cancer recurred in 14 of 44 patients (32%). The mean ADC value of tumors in patients with recurrence was lower than in those without recurrence (1.08 mm2/s vs. 1.28×10(-3) mm2/s; p=0.003). The optimal cutoff ADC value for predicting recurrence was determined to be 1.12×10(-3) mm2/s. A modest and significant negative correlation was observed between the ADC values and tumor size (r=-0.436, p=0.008). After adjustment for size and risk groups, an ADC value equal to or less than the optimal cutoff remained a significant predictor of recurrence (odds ratio 6.3, 95% CI 1.23-32.2, p=0.027).
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment ADC values may be an independent predictor of bladder cancer recurrence.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22819133     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  4 in total

1.  Apparent diffusion coefficient on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in bladder cancer: relations with recurrence/progression risk.

Authors:  Ken Kikuchi; Takeshi Shigihara; Yuko Hashimoto; Masayuki Miyajima; Nobuhiro Haga; Yoshiyuki Kojima; Fumio Shishido
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-05

2.  Comparison of Coregistration Accuracy of Pelvic Structures Between Sequential and Simultaneous Imaging During Hybrid PET/MRI in Patients with Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Arjun V Balar; William C Huang; Kimberly Jackson; Kent P Friedman
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 7.794

Review 3.  Pitfalls and Limitations of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Urinary Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Ching Lin; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 4.  Incorporating prognostic imaging biomarkers into clinical practice.

Authors:  W Phillip Law; Kenneth A Miles
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.909

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.